feat: attestation extension for eligibility claims#264
Open
douglasborthwick-crypto wants to merge 1 commit intoUniversal-Commerce-Protocol:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
Author
|
@googlebot I signed it! |
Adds a capability extension that complements eligibility (Universal-Commerce-Protocol#250) with cryptographic attestation proofs. Platforms relay signed attestations alongside eligibility claims; Businesses verify offline via JWKS. Follows the discount extension pattern (allOf on Cart/Checkout). Discussed in Universal-Commerce-Protocol#203 and Universal-Commerce-Protocol#250 — igrigorik invited this as a companion extension ("a great candidate, additive and non-breaking").
5215efc to
23e496c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a capability extension that complements eligibility (#250) with cryptographic attestation proofs for non-instrument claims (token holdings, on-chain credentials, membership status).
context.eligibilityclaimsprovider_jwks, select key bykid, verifysigoverpayloadpayloadis an opaque passthrough of the provider's signed object — no transformation, so signature verification works end-to-endexpires_atlives outsidepayloadbecause it is not covered by the signature — the Business checks this independentlyFollows the discount extension pattern (
allOfon Cart and Checkout, sibling map keyed by reverse-domain eligibility claims).Context
Discussed and invited in #203 and #250:
provider_jwks/kid/payload/sigattestation pattern in the signals specWire format example
{ "context": { "eligibility": ["com.example.token_holder"] }, "attestations": { "com.example.token_holder": { "provider_jwks": "https://example.com/.well-known/jwks.json", "kid": "example-key-2026-01", "payload": { "id": "att-7c3e9f", "pass": true, "results": ["..."], "attestedAt": "2026-03-13T19:20:32.530Z" }, "sig": "base64...", "expires_at": "2026-03-13T19:50:32.530Z" } } }Verification flow
context.eligibilityclaim + matchingattestationsentryprovider_jwks, selects key matchingkidsigover the payload (platforms must preserve the provider's original serialization)expires_athasn't passedpayload.passto confirm the claim is metNo callback to the Platform or attestation provider required — fully offline.
Test plan
$reftotypes/reverse_domain_name.jsonresolves correctlyallOfcomposition withcart.jsonandcheckout.jsonproduces valid combined schemas🤖 Generated with Claude Code