Skip to content

chore(main): release protoc-gen-elixir-grpc 0.4.0#34

Merged
yordis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--protoc-gen-elixir-grpc
Dec 20, 2025
Merged

chore(main): release protoc-gen-elixir-grpc 0.4.0#34
yordis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--protoc-gen-elixir-grpc

Conversation

@sht-bot

@sht-bot sht-bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

An automated release has been created for you.

0.4.0 (2025-12-20)

Features

  • protoc-gen-elixir-grpc: Add server_module_prefix option (#33) (e506d5d)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Signed-off-by: Straw Hat Team Bot <61149376+sht-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

Version bump of cmd/protoc-gen-elixir-grpc from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 with corresponding changelog entry documenting the new server_module_prefix option addition.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Release management
.github/.release-please-manifest.json
Version updated from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 for cmd/protoc-gen-elixir-grpc
Changelog
cmd/protoc-gen-elixir-grpc/CHANGELOG.md
New version 0.4.0 entry (2025-12-20) added documenting the server_module_prefix option feature

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Both changes are documentation/configuration updates with no functional code modifications
  • Straightforward version alignment between manifest and changelog

Suggested labels

autorelease: tagged

Poem

🐰 A version bump hops into place,
From 0.3.0's previous embrace,
0.4.0 takes the stage today,
With server_module_prefix leading the way,
The changelog dances, the manifest aligned,
A release well-crafted, precisely designed! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: releasing version 0.4.0 of protoc-gen-elixir-grpc.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, detailing the automated release with changelog entry for version 0.4.0 and the server_module_prefix feature addition.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch release-please--branches--main--components--protoc-gen-elixir-grpc

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e506d5d and 84fc2c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/.release-please-manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • cmd/protoc-gen-elixir-grpc/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/.release-please-manifest.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump is correct.

The version update from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 is consistent with the changelog entry and PR objectives.

cmd/protoc-gen-elixir-grpc/CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-9: Changelog entry for v0.4.0 is correctly formatted and properly references issue #33 and commit e506d5d.

The entry follows the conventional changelog format consistently with previous versions and documents the new server_module_prefix feature with accurate links to both the issue and commit.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@yordis
yordis merged commit 2206a2f into main Dec 20, 2025
3 checks passed
@yordis
yordis deleted the release-please--branches--main--components--protoc-gen-elixir-grpc branch December 20, 2025 06:53
@sht-bot

sht-bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Created releases:

🌻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants