Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for tradetrust-gallery ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughTwo static Verifiable Credential JSONs for electronic promissory notes were updated. Both swapped QR code URIs between operative/inoperative variants and refreshed identifiers (top-level id, credentialStatus.tokenId) and BBS+ proof fields (proof.created, proofValue). No schema, issuer, or verificationMethod changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15–20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-inoperative.json (2)
47-48: Gitleaks warning is a false positiveThe tokenRegistry address and tokenId are public on-chain identifiers, not secrets. Consider allowlisting this path/pattern to avoid noise in CI.
42-42: Confirm intent: QR codes cross-link between operative and inoperative variantsI ran the helper script — both JSON files' qrCode payloads point to the other variant (they're cross-linked). Please confirm intended UX or change to self-referencing QR for reproducibility.
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-inoperative.json
- qrCode.payload.uri → https://gallery.tradetrust.io/static/electronic-promissory-note-operative.json
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-operative.json
- qrCode.payload.uri → https://gallery.tradetrust.io/static/electronic-promissory-note-inoperative.json
If cross-linking is intentional, no change needed. If not, update each file's qrCode.payload.uri to reference its own JSON.
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-operative.json (2)
42-42: Confirm intent: QR code now links to the inoperative variantMirrors the other file by cross-linking. If the QR should resolve to itself instead, swap to the operative JSON URI.
You can use the same verification script provided in the other comment to inspect what the QR resolves to.
47-48: Gitleaks “generic API key” — likely false positiveThese fields are public blockchain identifiers. Recommend adding an ignore rule for these sample static JSONs to reduce CI noise.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-inoperative.json(1 hunks)public/static/electronic-promissory-note-operative.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.27.2)
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-operative.json
47-47: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
48-48: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-inoperative.json
47-47: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
48-48: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-inoperative.json (3)
48-48: tokenId rotation looks fine; ensure it maps to the intended sample stateNew tokenId set. Sanity check that:
- It corresponds to the intended sample token on chain 101010 in the given registry.
- It’s unique across the two variants (no accidental reuse).
52-52: New VC id assigned — LGTMTop-level id rotated to a new urn. No issues.
55-55: Proof metadata refreshed — ensure verifiability passesBBS+ proof timestamp and value updated to match content changes. Looks correct. Please verify in the gallery/trust viewer that the credential still verifies end-to-end.
Also applies to: 57-57
public/static/electronic-promissory-note-operative.json (3)
48-48: tokenId rotation — LGTM, but verify registry mappingNew tokenId is a distinct 32-byte hex. Validate it reflects the correct sample state in the configured FREE/101010 network.
52-52: New VC id assigned — LGTM
55-55: Proof metadata updated — LGTM; perform a viewer verificationProof timestamp and value updated. Please sanity-check in the viewer that the signature validates with the existing verificationMethod.
Also applies to: 57-57
2 participants
Summary
document naming wrongly, so did a swap
Changes
Issues
document naming wrong:
operative as inoperative
inoperative as operative
Releases
Channels: latest
ETA: Any target release date
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores