fix(Tree): enhance disabled state logic

[RylanBot]

🤔 这个 PR 的性质是？

• 日常 bug 修复
• 新特性提交
• 文档改进
• 演示代码改进
• 组件样式/交互改进
• CI/CD 改进
• 重构
• 代码风格优化
• 测试用例
• 分支合并
• 其他

🔗 相关 Issue

Tencent/tdesign-react#3828

💡 需求背景和解决方案

• 将 Vue 端使用的新版 tree/tree-node 中部分逻辑同步到 React 端使用的旧版 tree-v1/tree-node
• 新旧版本统一确保 tree-node-model 返回的 disabled 对应真实的 UI 状态

📝 更新日志

• fix(Tree): 修复 TreeNodeModel 中的 disabled 与 UI 状态不同步的问题

• 本条 PR 不需要纳入 Changelog

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项。⚠️

• 文档已补充或无须补充
• 代码演示已提供或无须提供
• TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
• Changelog 已提供或无须提供

[tdesign-bot]

TDesign Component Repositories CI Test Open

Component	Lint	Test	Build	Preview
tdesign-vue	✅	✅	✅	👀
tdesign-vue-next	✅	✅	✅	👀
tdesign-react	✅	✅	✅	👀
tdesign-web-components	✅	✅	✅	👀
tdesign-mobile-vue	✅	✅	✅	👀
tdesign-mobile-react	✅	✅	✅	👀

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances the disabled state logic for Tree components by synchronizing disabled state management between the Vue and React versions. The changes ensure that the TreeNodeModel's disabled property correctly reflects the actual UI state.

• Refactors disabled state logic with proper priority handling (Tree config > checkStrictly > manual > node data > disableCheck)
• Adds a new disableManually property to track manual disabled state changes
• Updates the TreeNodeModel to expose the disabled property for better state synchronization

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
js/tree/tree-node.ts	Refactored disabled state logic with new priority system and manual state tracking
js/tree-v1/types.ts	Added disableCheck option to TreeStoreOptions interface
js/tree-v1/tree-node.ts	Applied same disabled state enhancements as the main tree implementation
js/tree-v1/tree-node-model.ts	Added disabled property to exposed TreeNodeModel properties

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[Copilot]

[nitpick] The trailing comma was removed from the parameter list. For consistency with the codebase and modern TypeScript practices, consider keeping the trailing comma.

Suggested change

	parent?: TreeNode
	parent?: TreeNode,

[Copilot]

The condition should check for strict boolean types to ensure type safety. Consider using this.disableManually !== null instead to be more explicit about the intention.

[Copilot]

The condition should check for strict boolean types to ensure type safety. Consider using this.disableManually !== null instead to be more explicit about the intention.

[Copilot]

The method silently returns when the parent is disabled and checkStrictly is false. This could be confusing for API consumers. Consider throwing an error or returning a boolean to indicate success/failure.

Suggested change

	public setDisabled(disabled: null | boolean) {
	if (!this.tree.config.checkStrictly && this.parent?.isDisabled()) return;
	// 当 disabled 为 null 时，恢复为默认的禁用逻辑，而非通过设置强制指定
	this.disableManually = disabled;
	this.update();
	this.updateChildren();
	public setDisabled(disabled: null | boolean): boolean {
	if (!this.tree.config.checkStrictly && this.parent?.isDisabled()) return false;
	// 当 disabled 为 null 时，恢复为默认的禁用逻辑，而非通过设置强制指定
	this.disableManually = disabled;
	this.update();
	this.updateChildren();
	return true;