Skip to content

Improve README following Hammer Auction House style (#47)#65

Open
ankitrraj wants to merge 2 commits intoStabilityNexus:mainfrom
ankitrraj:improve-readme-47
Open

Improve README following Hammer Auction House style (#47)#65
ankitrraj wants to merge 2 commits intoStabilityNexus:mainfrom
ankitrraj:improve-readme-47

Conversation

@ankitrraj
Copy link

@ankitrraj ankitrraj commented Dec 13, 2025

Improved README following Hammer House style. Closes #47

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Redesigned README into a branded product-style landing with center-aligned header, logos and badges
    • Added a hodlCoin Staking Platform section outlining architecture and features
    • Expanded Tech Stack for frontend and blockchain, plus browser guidance
    • Overhauled Getting Started with prerequisites and explicit npm/yarn/pnpm install/run commands
    • Added a Contributing section and removed obsolete Next font optimization note

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Walkthrough

README.md was replaced/expanded from a minimal Next.js starter description into a comprehensive, branded project README with centered headers, badges, hodlCoin Staking Platform overview, expanded tech stacks, detailed multi-package-manager Getting Started instructions, and a Contributing section.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Enhancement
README.md
Replaced minimal Next.js bootstrap README with a full product-style README: center-aligned branding (logos, badges), hodlCoin Staking Platform overview, separated Frontend & Blockchain tech stacks, expanded Getting Started (prereqs, clone, install, run — npm/yarn/pnpm), browser guidance, and a Contributing section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify badges, logos, and social links render and point to intended targets
  • Confirm installation and run commands for npm, yarn, and pnpm are correct
  • Check formatting (headings, lists, code blocks) and accessibility of images

Poem

🐰 I polished the README, made it shine bright,
Badges and logos arranged just right.
Tech stacks listed, instructions in sight,
Clone, install, run — then take flight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: updating the README to follow the Hammer Auction House style, which directly aligns with the actual content modifications described in the changeset.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The pull request meets the objectives of issue #47 by substantially improving the README content and presentation while aligning the style and structure with the Hammer Auction House repository style.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are limited to README.md and directly support the stated objective of improving the README following Hammer Auction House style; no unrelated modifications are present.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37573e7 and 3f1d97d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~108-~108: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2752 characters long)
Context: ...preciate your feedback and contributions!

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
README.md (6)

1-10: Well-executed branded header section.

The centered layout with logos and social badges effectively establishes the project identity and follows the Hammer Auction House style as intended. The social media links are properly formatted and accessible.


14-26: Clear and comprehensive platform overview.

The hodlCoin Staking Platform section effectively communicates the project's purpose and key features with a well-organized bullet list. The description is professional and informative.


29-44: Well-organized Tech Stack section.

The clear categorization into Frontend and Blockchain subsections, with appropriate technology choices for a Web3 dApp, effectively communicates the project dependencies and architecture.


47-91: Comprehensive Getting Started section with excellent multi-package-manager support.

The prerequisites, installation, and development server instructions are clear, logically sequenced, and properly support npm, yarn, and pnpm—providing good flexibility for developers with different package manager preferences.


94-107: Contributing section resolved past critical issue; minor tone note.

The contributing workflow has been updated and no longer references the non-existent npm scripts (npm run format:write, npm run lint:fix, npm run typecheck) that were flagged in the previous review. The git workflow instructions are clear and practical.

Minor note: The document contains 6 exclamation marks, which static analysis flags as slightly excessive for its length. Consider toning down the closing message (line 108) to use a period instead of an exclamation mark for a more measured tone, though this is purely stylistic.


1-107: Excellent comprehensive README that achieves PR objectives.

The README successfully transforms from a minimal Next.js boilerplate description into a professional, branded project documentation that follows the Hammer Auction House style. The addition of platform overview, tech stack clarity, multi-package-manager getting started instructions, and contributing guidelines provides developers with clear onboarding and contribution paths. The previous critical issue regarding non-existent npm script references has been resolved. This is a substantial improvement to the repository's documentation quality and aligns well with the stated objectives of issue #47.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

111-112: Optional: Consider toning down enthusiasm in closing statements.

The closing lines use multiple exclamation marks that, while not problematic, could be slightly more formal. This is a minor stylistic preference—the current tone is friendly and appropriate for a community-focused project.

Consider revising the final sentences to be slightly more measured:

-We appreciate your feedback and contributions!
+We appreciate your feedback and contributions.

This maintains the friendly tone while reducing punctuation emphasis. However, the current version is acceptable as-is for a community-oriented project.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 787e368 and 37573e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~112-~112: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2817 characters long)
Context: ...preciate your feedback and contributions!

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)

14-26: Project overview is comprehensive and well-structured.

The hodlCoin Staking Platform section clearly communicates the project's purpose and key features with appropriate technical detail.


47-91: Installation instructions are clear and comprehensive.

The Getting Started section provides well-organized prerequisites and installation steps with support for multiple package managers. The instructions are appropriate for both experienced and new developers.


29-44: Verify that tech stack documentation aligns with actual project dependencies.

Cross-reference the listed technologies (Next.js 14+, TypeScript, TailwindCSS, shadcn/ui, Wagmi, Solidity Smart Contracts, Ethers.js, and Rainbow-Kit) against package.json to ensure the documentation remains accurate and complete.

Comment on lines +3 to +4
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StabilityNexus/HammerAuctionHouse-WebUI/main/public/stability.svg" alt="Stability Nexus Logo" width="200"/>
<img src="https://evm.hodlcoin.co.in/hodlcoin.svg" alt="hodlCoin Logo" width="200"/>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

head -20 README.md | cat -n

Repository: StabilityNexus/hodlCoin-Solidity-WebUI

Length of output: 2123


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify external image and social media URLs

echo "=== Checking Image URLs ==="
curl -s -I "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StabilityNexus/HammerAuctionHouse-WebUI/main/public/stability.svg" 2>&1 | head -1
curl -s -I "https://evm.hodlcoin.co.in/hodlcoin.svg" 2>&1 | head -1

echo -e "\n=== Checking Social Media Links ==="
declare -a links=(
  "https://t.me/StabilityNexus"
  "https://x.com/StabilityNexus"
  "https://discord.com/invite/YzDKeEfWtS"
  "https://news.stability.nexus/?gi=b27790163ddc"
  "https://www.linkedin.com/company/stability-nexus/"
  "https://www.youtube.com/@StabilityNexus"
)

for link in "${links[@]}"; do
  status=$(curl -s -I "$link" 2>&1 | head -1)
  echo "$link: $status"
done

Repository: StabilityNexus/hodlCoin-Solidity-WebUI

Length of output: 486


Verify external image URLs are accessible; some social media links may have access restrictions.

The README references external image URLs that are accessible and working correctly. However, some social media links return access restriction codes (HTTP 403/999) when accessed programmatically, though these may be due to anti-bot protection on those platforms rather than actual broken links:

  • ✓ Image URLs (GitHub, evm.hodlcoin.co.in): Both return HTTP 200
  • ✓ Telegram, Discord, YouTube: HTTP 200 (accessible)
  • ⚠ X (Twitter), Medium, LinkedIn: Return HTTP 403/999 (likely anti-bot protection, not necessarily broken)

Consider manually testing these social media links in a browser to confirm they lead to the correct accounts, or consider using services that specifically test social media profile URLs.

Also applies to: 8-8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve ReadMe

2 participants