Skip to content

Conversation

@Nitinn12
Copy link

@Nitinn12 Nitinn12 commented Dec 13, 2025

Removed the hard-coded stats from the homepage and replaced them with more meaningful, dynamic content. Updated the UI to include:

How does our protocol work?

Why is our protocol better than existing solutions?

These changes make the homepage more informative and easier to understand for users and judges.

Attached are screenshots of the updated UI for reference.
Screenshot 2025-12-13 160553
Screenshot 2025-12-13 160606

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Redesigned landing page with improved educational content
    • Added "How It Works" section featuring a visual 4-step guide explaining oracle operation and token staking
    • Introduced "The Complete Flow" section outlining oracle operation and reward distribution steps
    • Added "Why Is Our Protocol Better?" section comparing protocol advantages against traditional oracle limitations
    • New Key Differentiators card highlighting EWMA, Quorum, and flexible parameterization

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request restructures the landing page by replacing the Features and Stats sections with new content sections: "How It Works," "The Complete Flow," and "Why Is Our Protocol Better?" New Card components with lucide-react icons are added to visually represent oracle consensus mechanisms, token voting, and reward distribution concepts.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Landing page content restructure
app/page.tsx
Replaced Features and Stats sections with "How It Works" (4-column Card layout with Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins icons), "The Complete Flow" (5-step oracle operation outline), and "Why Is Our Protocol Better?" (dual-card comparison: OrbOracle Advantages vs. Traditional Oracle Limitations). Added CardContent import and CheckCircle2, XCircle icons from lucide-react.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Focus areas: Verify Card component structure consistency across new sections, confirm icon selections align with section meanings, validate content accuracy and alignment with protocol narrative.

Possibly related PRs

  • PR #8: Modifies CardContent structure and typography in the same file, affecting how Card-based sections render; coordinate Card styling consistency between PRs.

Poem

🐰 Oh, how the oracle blocks now sing,
With cards arranged in shimmering ring—
Icons dancing: coin, lock, and trend,
A flow complete from start to end!
The better path, at last, made plain!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title uses hyphenated words that obscure clarity ('Fix:improve- home- page- text- and- UI'). While it generally relates to the home page changes, the formatting is non-standard and reduces readability compared to conventional commit message style. Reformat the title to follow standard conventions, such as 'Improve home page text and UI with explanatory sections' or 'Refactor home page with How It Works and Protocol Benefits sections'.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
app/page.tsx (1)

290-292: Verify the "thousands of developers" claim or consider updating the copy.

The PR description mentions removing hard-coded stats in favor of more meaningful content. However, line 291 still references "Join thousands of developers" - if this is an aspirational/marketing claim rather than an actual statistic, consider rewording to avoid potentially misleading users.

-            <p className="text-xl text-muted-foreground mb-8">
-              Join thousands of developers building the next generation of decentralized applications
-            </p>
+            <p className="text-xl text-muted-foreground mb-8">
+              Join the community building the next generation of decentralized applications
+            </p>
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/page.tsx (2)

127-141: Consider extracting steps into a data array for maintainability.

The 5 steps follow an identical structure. Extracting them into a data array and mapping would reduce repetition and make future updates easier.

+const flowSteps = [
+  { step: 1, text: "Oracle creators deploy contracts with custom parameters (quorum, reward rate, half-life, etc.)" },
+  { step: 2, text: "Data providers stake tokens and submit price/value data to the oracle" },
+  { step: 3, text: "The protocol aggregates submissions using EWMA, weighted by token stake" },
+  { step: 4, text: "Once quorum is reached, the consensus value is finalized on-chain" },
+  { step: 5, text: "Accurate participants receive rewards from the oracle's reward pool" },
+];

// Then in the component:
-<p>
-  <strong className="text-foreground">Step 1:</strong> Oracle creators deploy contracts...
-</p>
-// ... repeated for each step
+{flowSteps.map(({ step, text }) => (
+  <p key={step}>
+    <strong className="text-foreground">Step {step}:</strong> {text}
+  </p>
+))}

168-205: Extract repeated list items into a reusable component or data-driven approach.

The advantages list has 6 items with identical structure. The same pattern repeats for the limitations section (lines 215-252). This creates ~80 lines of repetitive JSX.

// Define data arrays
const advantages = [
  { title: "Decentralized Governance:", text: "Token-weighted voting ensures no single point of control" },
  { title: "Time-Decay Mechanism:", text: "EWMA automatically reduces weight of stale data" },
  // ... other items
];

// Create a reusable list item component or map inline
{advantages.map((item, index) => (
  <div key={index} className="flex items-start gap-2">
    <CheckCircle2 className="h-4 w-4 text-green-500 mt-1 flex-shrink-0" />
    <div>
      <strong>{item.title}</strong> {item.text}
    </div>
  </div>
))}

This approach reduces duplication and makes content updates easier to manage.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e32af44 and 6368544.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/page.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/page.tsx (1)
components/ui/card.tsx (5)
  • Card (85-85)
  • CardHeader (86-86)
  • CardTitle (88-88)
  • CardDescription (90-90)
  • CardContent (91-91)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/page.tsx (4)

3-5: LGTM!

The new imports are correctly added and all are used within the component. The CardContent import aligns with the existing card component exports.


72-120: Well-structured card grid with good responsive breakpoints.

The 4-column responsive layout (md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-4) provides a good user experience across device sizes. Card structure is consistent with proper semantic hierarchy.


163-165: Good use of distinct icon shapes for accessibility.

Using CheckCircle2 and XCircle with different shapes (not just colors) helps users who may have difficulty distinguishing colors. The accompanying text also ensures the meaning is clear without relying solely on visual cues.


256-280: LGTM!

The Key Differentiators card effectively highlights the protocol's unique features with a clean 3-column layout and clear, concise descriptions.

import { Card, CardDescription, CardHeader, CardTitle, CardContent } from "@/components/ui/card"
import { Navigation } from "@/components/navigation"
import { ArrowRight, Database, Shield, Zap } from "lucide-react"
import { ArrowRight, Database, Shield, Zap, Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins, CheckCircle2, XCircle } from "lucide-react"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major

Remove unused icon imports.

Database, Shield, and Zap are imported but not used in the component. These appear to be remnants from the previous Features section that was replaced.

-import { ArrowRight, Database, Shield, Zap, Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins, CheckCircle2, XCircle } from "lucide-react"
+import { ArrowRight, Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins, CheckCircle2, XCircle } from "lucide-react"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import { ArrowRight, Database, Shield, Zap, Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins, CheckCircle2, XCircle } from "lucide-react"
import { ArrowRight, Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins, CheckCircle2, XCircle } from "lucide-react"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In app/page.tsx around line 5, the import statement includes unused icons
(Database, Shield, Zap); remove these three identifiers from the lucide-react
import so only used icons (ArrowRight, Users, TrendingUp, Lock, Coins,
CheckCircle2, XCircle) are imported, then run lint/typecheck to ensure no other
references remain and update any related imports if necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant