chore(main): release 1.24.0 - #1692
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 028a3fc659
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| [project] | ||
| name = "codex-lb" | ||
| version = "1.23.0" | ||
| version = "1.23.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update uv.lock with the release version
When v1.23.1 is published, the build job in .github/workflows/release.yml runs python -m scripts.verify_release_version --tag "${RELEASE_TAG}"; however, this version bump leaves the editable codex-lb entry in uv.lock at 1.23.0. Running that verifier against this commit raises ValueError: release version drift: expected '1.23.1'; uv.lock='1.23.0', so the build stops before creating the wheel and all dependent publishing jobs are blocked. Update the lockfile entry alongside this release bump.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
c8f20cd to
15042aa
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
7873c06 to
faa4f29
Compare
37cfc31 to
9d00a07
Compare
1c81e8f to
563c06c
Compare
66e65a0 to
4324192
Compare
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f57e0da9e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| [project] | ||
| name = "codex-lb" | ||
| version = "1.23.0" | ||
| version = "1.24.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Keep this release in beta until the required soak completes
The version change promotes this train directly to stable, but the history from the previous stable release (5ebc327) through this commit contains no v1.24.0-beta.N release, while the train includes telemetry/reset-credit features and multiple proxy fixes. It therefore does not qualify for the documentation/CI/tooling-only exception in the binding beta-first policy at .github/CONTRIBUTING.md:350-370; merging it would publish stable PyPI, Docker, and Helm artifacts without the required 48-hour production-scale soak. Prepare and soak a 1.24.0 beta before advancing these fields to the stable version.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L64-L66
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **compact:** omit oversized non-state tool tail ([#1235](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/issues/1235)) ([edb3734](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/commit/edb37348f19a5015c3b90e0509ed92179e3716da)) | ||
| * **dashboard:** exclude cancelled/client_disconnected from error rate ([#1696](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/issues/1696)) ([8a7d956](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/commit/8a7d9560571478a435f66f082b7656a6e9313f14)) | ||
| * **dashboard:** separate quota and purchased credits ([#1670](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/issues/1670)) ([4a08d96](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/commit/4a08d968f34aeec423892c02775769335590619f)) | ||
| * **http-bridge:** keep idle retirements out of retry circuit ([#1677](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/issues/1677)) ([7c46719](https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lb/commit/7c4671980094135b9094278d2ebb374c7cb22655)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Include the missing HTTP bridge watchdog fix
For users reading the 1.24.0 release notes, this bug-fix list omits commit 0eb0ee7 / PR #1580, which is part of the range after 5ebc327 and fixes the HTTP bridge missing-created watchdog plus stale API-key activity handling. Its non-Conventional squash title caused release-please to skip it, so the published changelog would inaccurately describe the fixes delivered by this version; add the missing release-note entry through the release process.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
f57e0da to
4646e56
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
2958ec6 to
ed0e89f
Compare
deed14d to
e4e8309
Compare
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan includes up to 3 reviews per rolling hour; 1 remains after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRelease metadata was updated from ChangesRelease metadata
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This release updates version metadata and includes the documented 1.24.0 changes; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@codex review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
e5db94c to
ddc6321
Compare
9187e45 to
f8fb318
Compare
🤖 I have created a release beep boop
1.24.0 (2026-08-16)
Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation