Defer caught-error log rendering

[Snuffy2]

Summary

Defers exception-detail rendering in the shared error wrapper until a log handler formats the emitted record.

What Changed

• Added a lazy exception-detail formatter for caught-error logs.
• Preserved ERROR-level logging, credential redaction, traceback content, and exception propagation.
• Added regression coverage for deferred rendering.

Why

Repeated caught errors should not pay traceback formatting and message-redaction costs when a log record is filtered or otherwise never formatted.

Greptile Summary

The PR snapshots sanitized exception details when caught while deferring traceback string formatting until a logging handler formats the record.

• Adds a cached lazy formatter for caught-error records.
• Adds regression coverage for credential redaction, traceback snapshots, and deferred formatting.
• Aligns the pydoclint hook with the repository’s Python 3.14 runtime.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge.

No blocking failure remains.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
aiopnsense/helpers.py	Replaces eager traceback string construction with a sanitized snapshot whose final formatting is deferred and cached.
tests/test_helpers.py	Verifies eager safe-data capture, deferred traceback formatting, cached rendering, and absence of retained exception or frame references.
prek.toml	Pins pydoclint to Python 3.14 consistently with the project runtime and existing hook configuration.

_{Reviews (3): Last reviewed commit: "Clarify error logging test fixtures" | Re-trigger Greptile}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@Snuffy2, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 43 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0b42ebdc-1d83-4f30-b8ee-e5aceed38118

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b08bb21 and 21472a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• aiopnsense/helpers.py
• prek.toml
• tests/test_helpers.py

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Coverage report

Click to see where and how coverage changed

File	Statements	Missing	Coverage	Coverage (new stmts)	Lines missing
aiopnsense
helpers.py
Project Total

This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action

[Snuffy2]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[Snuffy2]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 21472a5876

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".