Skip to content

Added clarification to clause 10.3.1 General #16

Closed
tbause wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
issues/0015-Clarify-Part-Number-Assignment
Closed

Added clarification to clause 10.3.1 General #16
tbause wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
issues/0015-Clarify-Part-Number-Assignment

Conversation

@tbause
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tbause tbause commented May 9, 2023

Added clarification on who assigns part numbers and how they are assigned.

who assigns part numbers and how they are assigned.
@tbause tbause requested review from SteveLLamb and palemieux May 9, 2023 20:51
@tbause tbause self-assigned this May 9, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SteveLLamb SteveLLamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SMPTE HO might have more info on all docs, good to check in case unknown conflicts.

Comment thread doc/main.html Outdated
Comment thread doc/main.html Outdated
Part numbers should be continuously ascending from document to document (e.g. <code>1020-1:2009</code>, <code>1020-2:2011</code>, <code>1020-3:2012</code>) unless part numbers are used to organize large sets of multi-part documents.
</p>
<p>
The TC Chair shall assign document numbers in consultation with the document editor. Part numbers may be assigned at the request of the document editor at any time after a Project is approved and shall be assigned before a Final Committee Draft ballot is issued.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TC Chair is not a defined term, Technology Committee Chair(s) is the term.

I recommend that the Standards Director shall be responsible for assigning the part number in consultation with the Technology Committee Chair(s) since it is the Standards Director that maintains the database of documents.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not common practice and HO does not track part numbers until documents are published. HO is also not necessarily aware of the part number systems used in some efforts e.g. DC, IMF or SMPTE ST 2110 used to organize documents of a standards suite. HO can't make a judgement on where in such a part number system to place a document because it sometimes requires technical expertise. Additionally, we may not know the history about why certain part numbers are not used. The TC chair and the document editor or DG are better suite to do that. I prefer Steve's proposal.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@palemieux @tbause see b8dc221 for update as per discussion with Thomas today. Can wordsmith as needed.

SteveLLamb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2026
@SteveLLamb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing this, as integrated into #33.

@SteveLLamb SteveLLamb closed this Jan 7, 2026
SteveLLamb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
* closes #32

* udpate iso 8601, closes #31

* integrate changes from pr #16. closes #15

* roll to draft

* roll to pub
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants