Skip to content

Conversation

@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor

@SiboWang1997 SiboWang1997 commented Nov 18, 2025

Short description:

Check the load field issue on Jenkins

More details:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for reviewer:
jira-ticket:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed workaround code that was conditionally suppressing certain system data due to a previously tracked issue, restoring consistent behavior in all operational states.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Removes Jira bug 67104 workaround logic from a utility module by deleting the is_jira_67104_bug_open() function and its imports, along with conditional field-removal logic in _get_os_info().

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Jira bug 67104 workaround removal
tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/utils.py
Removed cache import from functools, removed is_jira_open import from utilities.jira, deleted is_jira_67104_bug_open() function definition, and removed invocation of that function with its associated conditional logic that dropped the "load" field from virtctl_info and cnv_info objects.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

verified, size/XS, can-be-merged, branch-main, tox:verify-tc-requirement-polarion:passed, tox:verify-bugs-are-open:passed, lgtm-openshift-virtualization-qe-bot, sig-virt

Suggested reviewers

  • jerry7z
  • kbidarkar
  • akri3i
  • dshchedr
  • vsibirsk

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is largely incomplete with only a short description filled in; critical sections like 'More details', 'What this PR does / why we need it', and 'jira-ticket' are missing or empty. Complete the description by explaining why the Jira bug workaround was removed, what issue it fixes, and providing the relevant Jira ticket URL or 'NONE' if not tracked.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title uses 'WIP' prefix and vague phrasing ('Plz don't review', 'check the load field issue on Jenkins') that obscure the actual technical change being made. Clarify the title to describe the actual change: e.g., 'Remove Jira bug check for load field in cluster utils' or 'Fix load field handling in virtctl info' to convey the specific technical modification.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@SiboWang1997 SiboWang1997 changed the title Check the load field issue on Jenkins Plz don't review, check the load field issue on Jenkins Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-2

Report bugs in Issues

Welcome! 🎉

This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features:

🔄 Automatic Actions

  • Reviewer Assignment: Reviewers are automatically assigned based on the "
    "OWNERS file in the repository root
    "
    "* Size Labeling: PR size labels (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) are "
    "automatically applied based on changes
    "
    f"* Issue Creation: A tracking issue is created for this PR and will be closed when the PR is merged or closed
    "
    "* Pre-commit Checks: pre-commit runs "
    "automatically if .pre-commit-config.yaml exists
    "
  • Branch Labeling: Branch-specific labels are applied to track the target branch
  • Auto-verification: Auto-verified users have their PRs automatically marked as verified

📋 Available Commands

PR Status Management

  • /wip - Mark PR as work in progress (adds WIP: prefix to title)
  • /wip cancel - Remove work in progress status
  • /hold - Block PR merging (approvers only)
  • /hold cancel - Unblock PR merging
  • /verified - Mark PR as verified
  • /verified cancel - Remove verification status
  • /reprocess - Trigger complete PR workflow reprocessing (useful if webhook failed or configuration changed)

Review & Approval

  • /lgtm - Approve changes (looks good to me)
  • /approve - Approve PR (approvers only)
  • /automerge - Enable automatic merging when all requirements are met (maintainers and approvers only)
  • /assign-reviewers - Assign reviewers based on OWNERS file
  • /assign-reviewer @username - Assign specific reviewer
  • /check-can-merge - Check if PR meets merge requirements

Testing & Validation

  • /retest tox - Run Python test suite with tox
  • /retest build-container - Rebuild and test container image
  • /retest all - Run all available tests

Container Operations

  • /build-and-push-container - Build and push container image (tagged with PR number)
    • Supports additional build arguments: /build-and-push-container --build-arg KEY=value

Cherry-pick Operations

  • /cherry-pick <branch> - Schedule cherry-pick to target branch when PR is merged
    • Multiple branches: /cherry-pick branch1 branch2 branch3

Label Management

  • /<label-name> - Add a label to the PR
  • /<label-name> cancel - Remove a label from the PR

✅ Merge Requirements

This PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:

  1. Approval: /approve from at least one approver
  2. LGTM Count: Minimum 2 /lgtm from reviewers
  3. Status Checks: All required status checks must pass
  4. No Blockers: No WIP, hold, or conflict labels
  5. Verified: PR must be marked as verified (if verification is enabled)

📊 Review Process

Approvers and Reviewers

Approvers:

  • dshchedr
  • vsibirsk

Reviewers:

  • SamAlber
  • SiboWang1997
  • akri3i
  • dshchedr
  • jerry7z
  • kbidarkar
  • vsibirsk
Available Labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm
  • approve
  • automerge

💡 Tips

  • WIP Status: Use /wip when your PR is not ready for review
  • Verification: The verified label is automatically removed on each new commit
  • Cherry-picking: Cherry-pick labels are processed when the PR is merged
  • Container Builds: Container images are automatically tagged with the PR number
  • Permission Levels: Some commands require approver permissions
  • Auto-verified Users: Certain users have automatic verification and merge privileges

For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers.

@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor Author

/wip

@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor Author

/wip

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3 openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3 changed the title Plz don't review, check the load field issue on Jenkins WIP: Plz don't review, check the load field issue on Jenkins Nov 18, 2025
@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

1 similar comment
@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-2

New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-2715 published

@SiboWang1997 SiboWang1997 changed the base branch from main to cnv-4.20 November 18, 2025 12:00
@SiboWang1997 SiboWang1997 changed the base branch from cnv-4.20 to main November 18, 2025 12:03
Signed-off-by: Sibo Wang <[email protected]>
@SiboWang1997 SiboWang1997 changed the base branch from main to cnv-4.20 November 19, 2025 06:08
@SiboWang1997
Copy link
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-2

New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-2715 published

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants