Enable regression testing of model output with BuildingsPy #670
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
@marcusfuchs this should help implementing it in the CI for auto test the simulation. I will transfer that to an internal branch. How exactly is the use of the copy of the reference results working or how should we use that for the test process? |
Merged
Contributor
|
now in #672 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For #669:
The Modelica output generated by TEASER now includes all scripts and annotations to easily run regression tests on all the building models. From the top-level of the model output, simply run
python Resources\Scripts\runUnitTests.pyand everything should work. For testing against existing results e.g. in CI pipelines,Project.dir_reference_resultsalso copies existing reference results into the TEASER output.@MichaMans what do you think about the next steps for this? From my perspective, this has everything we would need for our internal CI pipelines.