feat(stinkytofu): add stinkytofu logicalIR adapter as alternative rocisa backend

[jimbochi]

Motivation

Technical Details

Test Plan

Test Result

Submission Checklist

• Look over the contributing guidelines at https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests.

[therock-pr-bot]

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check	Status	Details
🌿 Branch Name	✅ Pass	—
📝 PR Title/Description	❌ Fail	Error: PR description must reference a JIRA ID, ISSUE ID, or a GitHub closing keyword. Expected: include a JIRA ID / ISSUE ID line (separator : or -, or omitted; value may be a JIRA key, a number with/without #, or a link), OR a closing keyword + issue reference. Accepted examples: • JIRA ID : TESTAUTO-6039 • JIRA ID - #330 • JIRA ID #330 • ISSUE ID : TESTUTO-3334 • ISSUE ID #3334 • ISSUE ID - TESTAUTO-3433 • ISSUE ID : https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/1234 • Closes #10 • Fixes octo-org/octo-repo#100 • Resolves: #123 • #123 • https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/123 Current: no valid JIRA/ISSUE/closing-keyword reference found
⛔ Forbidden Files	✅ Pass	—
🧪 Unit Test	✅ Pass	—
🔎 pre-commit	❌ Fail	Error: Check concluded with failure.
🚫 Draft PR	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🚩 Feature Flag	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
📊 Code Coverage	🔜 To Be Enabled	—

⚠️ 2 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

• ❌ PR Title/Description
• ❌ pre-commit

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

[therock-pr-bot]

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

• ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 70 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ts/hipblaslt/tensilelite/rocisa/rocisa/__init__.py	0.00%	61 Missing ⚠️
...ects/hipblaslt/tensilelite/Tensile/KernelWriter.py	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (33.43%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #8895       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    65.14%   33.43%   -31.70%     
============================================
  Files         2628      132     -2496     
  Lines       413042    59250   -353792     
  Branches     61873    12291    -49582     
============================================
- Hits        269042    19810   -249232     
+ Misses      123489    37481    -86008     
+ Partials     20511     1959    -18552     

Flag	Coverage Δ
TensileLite	33.43% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
hipBLAS	?
hipBLASLt	?
hipCUB	?
hipDNN	?
hipFFT	?
hipRAND	?
hipSOLVER	?
hipSPARSE	?
rocBLAS	?
rocFFT	?
rocRAND	?
rocSOLVER	?
rocSPARSE	?
rocThrust	?

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ects/hipblaslt/tensilelite/Tensile/KernelWriter.py	11.63% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
...ts/hipblaslt/tensilelite/rocisa/rocisa/__init__.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 2496 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Alex-Vasile]

Please add a full PR description. This PR is not reviewable in its current state.

[KKyang]

Couple things:

1. rocisa/CMakeLists.txt shouldn't couple to stinkytofu unconditionally — right now it always add_subdirectory(shared/stinkytofu) + forces BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON when the sibling dir exists, and rocisa/__init__.py always tries importing the adapter when ROCISA_BACKEND=stinkytofu is set, with no arch check. This should be decoupled cleanly: gfx1250+ imports stinkytofu, everything else stays on native rocisa with no stinkytofu in the build/import path at all.

2. New files have the legacy MIT header instead of SPDX (tensilelite/CLAUDE.md requires SPDX for new files). At least rocisa_stinkytofu_adaptor/__init__.py and base.py have it — looks like it's the copy-paste template for the whole package so probably worth fixing once at the source.

Rest of what I found is either dead code given gfx1250-only scope right now or already called out as a known gap in the PR's own notes, so not blocking.