Skip to content

fix: add CSRF protection in plus-checkout.js#308

Open
anupamme wants to merge 1 commit into
QLHazyCoder:devfrom
anupamme:fix-repo-flowpilot-v-002-csrf-payment-origin-check
Open

fix: add CSRF protection in plus-checkout.js#308
anupamme wants to merge 1 commit into
QLHazyCoder:devfrom
anupamme:fix-repo-flowpilot-v-002-csrf-payment-origin-check

Conversation

@anupamme

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fix high severity security issue in flows/openai/content/plus-checkout.js.

Vulnerability

Field Value
ID V-002
Severity HIGH
Scanner multi_agent_ai
Rule V-002
File flows/openai/content/plus-checkout.js:801
Assessment Likely exploitable
CWE CWE-352

Description: Payment initiation occurs entirely client-side using a Bearer token obtained from the session endpoint. No CSRF protection, re-authentication, or visible server-side authorization checks are present in the client code. While the actual authorization enforcement should be on ChatGPT's backend, this client-side implementation assumes the backend is secure and provides no additional safeguards.

Evidence

Exploitation scenario: If an attacker achieves JavaScript execution in the chatgpt.com context (via XSS on that domain), they can call this function directly.

Scanner confirmation: multi_agent_ai rule V-002 flagged this pattern.

Production code: This file is in the production codebase, not test-only code.

Threat Model Context

This is a Node.js library - vulnerabilities affect downstream consumers who use this package.

Changes

  • flows/openai/content/plus-checkout.js

Behavior Preservation

The change is scoped to 1 file on the vulnerable path, and the project's existing tests still pass, so intended behavior is unchanged.

Verification

  • Build passes
  • Scanner re-scan confirms fix
  • LLM code review passed

Automated security fix by OrbisAI Security

Automated security fix generated by OrbisAI Security
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant