-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
DEA cost for Fischer-Tropsch, methanolisation #238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestions. There are a few things I have to ask you to recheck!
|
||
* Corrected CO2 content in biogas | ||
|
||
* Change to DEA costs for Fischer-Tropsch and methanolisation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You also changed the assumptions for methanation. Was this intentional?
* Change to DEA costs for Fischer-Tropsch and methanolisation | |
* Change to DEA costs for Fischer-Tropsch, methanolisation, and methanation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it was intentional but apparently forgot to mention it in the release note. The Agora cost assumptions for F-T and methanolisation are on the far end of the optimistic range in literature, which is not consistent with the level of optimism for other fuel types we include. I judged this to apply also for methanation, which unfortunately does not exist in the DEA database used though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is that we had methanation
also in the old PyPSA assumptions that are overwritten with the manual_input.csv
. Which goes back even further with hard-to-track-down data provenance.
I'd prefer to keep methanation
, even if it is overly optimistic. Maybe you can add a short comment saying that it is overly optimistic? Would that be a good compromise for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left it as it was without the comment about it being optimistic.
outputs/costs_2020.csv
Outdated
FT fuel transport ship,investment,35000000.0,EUR,"Assume comparable tanker as for LOHC transport above, c.f. Runge et al 2020, Table 10, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3623514 .",,2020.0 | ||
FT fuel transport ship,lifetime,15.0,years,"Assume comparable tanker as for LOHC transport above, c.f. Runge et al 2020, Table 10, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3623514 .",,2020.0 | ||
Fischer-Tropsch,FOM,3.0,%/year,"Agora Energiewende (2018): The Future Cost of Electricity-Based Synthetic Fuels (https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/publications/the-future-cost-of-electricity-based-synthetic-fuels-1/), section 6.3.2.1.",,2017.0 | ||
Fischer-Tropsch,FOM,0.0008,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",102 Hydrogen to Jet: Fixed O&M,2020.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you recheck this number. Appears too low.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely too low, will recalculate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed!
Fischer-Tropsch,capture rate,0.9,per unit,Assumption based on doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.006,, | ||
Fischer-Tropsch,carbondioxide-input,0.36,t_CO2/MWh_FT,"DEA (2022): Technology Data for Renewable Fuels (https://ens.dk/en/our-services/projections-and-models/technology-data/technology-data-renewable-fuels), Hydrogen to Jet Fuel, Table 10 / pg. 267.","Input per 1t FT liquid fuels output, carbon efficiency increases with years (4.3, 3.9, 3.6, 3.3 t_CO2/t_FT from 2020-2050 with LHV 11.95 MWh_th/t_FT).", | ||
Fischer-Tropsch,efficiency,0.799,per unit,"Agora Energiewende (2018): The Future Cost of Electricity-Based Synthetic Fuels (https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/publications/the-future-cost-of-electricity-based-synthetic-fuels-1/), section 6.3.2.2.",,2017.0 | ||
Fischer-Tropsch,efficiency,0.65,per unit,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx","102 Hydrogen to Jet: FT Liquids Output,",2020.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The efficiency is much lower, is this because of different fractions being considered as output in both publications?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both are to liquid fuels. But in DEA there is a progression towards 75% by 2050, while the same value is assumed for all years from Agora, so it makes a large difference for 2020.
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,investment,2781006.4359,EUR/(t_HVC/h),"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Table 35",Assuming CAPEX of 1200 €/t actually given in €/(t/a).,2015.0,, | ||
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,lifetime,30.0,years,Guesstimate,same as steam cracker,,, | ||
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,methanol-input,18.03,MWh_MeOH/t_HVC,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Sections 4.5 (for ethylene and propylene) and 4.6 (for BTX)","Weighted average: 2.83 t_MeOH/t_ethylene+propylene for 21.7 Mt of ethylene and 17 Mt of propylene, 4.2 t_MeOH/t_BTX for 15.7 Mt of BTX. Assuming 5.54 MWh_MeOH/t_MeOH. ",,, | ||
methanolisation,FOM,3.0,%/year,"Agora Energiewende (2018): The Future Cost of Electricity-Based Synthetic Fuels (https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/publications/the-future-cost-of-electricity-based-synthetic-fuels-1/), section 6.3.2.1.",,2017.0,, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FOM is missing for methanolisation in your new dataset
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added
outputs/US/costs_2020.csv
Outdated
methanolisation,hydrogen-input,1.138,MWh_H2/MWh_MeOH,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf) , pg. 64.",189 kg_H2 per t_MeOH,,, | ||
methanolisation,investment,819108.478,EUR/MW_MeOH,"Agora Energiewende (2018): The Future Cost of Electricity-Based Synthetic Fuels (https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/publications/the-future-cost-of-electricity-based-synthetic-fuels-1/), table 8: “Reference scenario”.","Well developed technology, no significant learning expected.",2017.0,, | ||
methanolisation,lifetime,20.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, Technology Data for Renewable Fuels (04/2022), Data sheet “Methanol to Power”.",,2017.0,, | ||
methanolisation,investment,1345.9296,EUR/kW-methanol,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",98 Methanol from hydrogen: Specific investment,2020.0,, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
methanolisation,investment,1345.9296,EUR/kW-methanol,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",98 Methanol from hydrogen: Specific investment,2020.0,, | |
methanolisation,investment,1345.9296,EUR/kW_MeOH,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",98 Methanol from hydrogen: Specific investment,2020.0,, |
Can you adjust the script, such that the unit is kW_MeOH
for consistency?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will do!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
@euronion I made the updates, please have a look! |
Closes # (if applicable).
Changes proposed in this Pull Request
Changing from Agora values for methanolisation, Fischer-Tropsch and methanation to DEA values.
Checklist
doc
.environment.yaml
(if applicable).doc/release_notes.rst
of the upcoming release is included.