Add DelaunayNN workspace coverage - #255
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Findings
For 1,200 mesh vertices and 4,421 data-grid rows, observed maxima were 27 neighbors and 25 cavity triangles on the main grid, and 21 neighbors and 19 cavity triangles on split points. Cap 16 overflowed substantially and cap 24 still overflowed four rows in the worst model; cap 32 covered the complete audit.
DelaunayNN source reconstruction was numerically close to Delaunay: relative L2 error
9.884215e-05, correlation0.998595442.Dependency
Exercises the core implementation in PyAutoLabs/PyAutoArray#441.
Validation
git diff --checkpasses