Skip to content

Better System for High Impedance (X) values #248

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Prerna-0202 wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Better System for High Impedance (X) values #248

Prerna-0202 wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@Prerna-0202
Copy link
Owner

@Prerna-0202 Prerna-0202 commented Mar 19, 2023 •
edited
Loading

GSOC

POC

Fixes #244

Describe the changes you have made in this PR -

  1. Node.js Added, a condition that propagates an X state instead when tristate is in a high impedance state.
  2. Fixed Controlled Inverter.
  3. Fixed (When the enable pin of the tristate buffer is grounded, not passing through the input, it will cause a Simulation Stack Limit Exceeded error if the output is connected to the input.)

Screenshots of the changes (If any) -

Tristate.webm

Note: Please check Allow edits from maintainers. if you would like us to assist in the PR.

@Prerna-0202 Prerna-0202 changed the title better system for high impedance (X) values Better System for High Impedance (X) values Mar 19, 2023
@ThatDeparted2061 ThatDeparted2061 mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make a better system for high impedance (X) values

2 participants

@Prerna-0202