Skip to content

Conversation

@thibaultzanini
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

claude added 2 commits January 8, 2026 13:34
Comprehensive audit of 8 MJSON files in data/model/questionnaire/:
- Validated JSON syntax, inheritance chains, and property descriptors
- Identified 2 minor issues: orphaned property in questionnaire-question.mjson and unused definition in variable.mjson
- 6 files are fully valid with correct structure
- questionnaire-question.mjson: Add missing notes property to propertyDescriptors
- variable.mjson: Remove unused variablePrototype definition
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR validates MJSON configuration files in the data/model/questionnaire directory and fixes two identified issues: an orphaned property definition and an unused definition.

  • Added validation report documenting 8 MJSON files
  • Fixed orphaned notes property in questionnaire-question.mjson by adding it to propertyDescriptors array
  • Removed unused variablePrototype definition from variable.mjson

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
mjson-validation-report.md New validation report documenting the analysis of 8 MJSON configuration files and identifying 2 issues
data/model/questionnaire/variable.mjson Removed unused variablePrototype definition (lines 26-28)
data/model/questionnaire/questionnaire-question.mjson Added notes property reference to propertyDescriptors array to expose the previously orphaned property definition

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

"variable": {
"object": "./variable"
},
"variablePrototype": {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unused

{"@": "possibleAnswers"},
{"@": "respondentQuestionnaireAnswers"}
{"@": "respondentQuestionnaireAnswers"},
{"@": "notes"}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants