-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Add academic indicator: Thematic Persistence #86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hi @PetrosStav, thanks for this! It is my impression that there is much more literature that looks into emerging topics, and this approach is certainly not the only one. In order to provide a fair overview of such a type of indicator, it would be good to not only focus on the one that has been studied in one of our case studies, but also to provide the other relevant approaches / indicators. |
|
Hi @vtraag, I revised this indicator and added some literature that looks into topic persistence, made the description + measurement more general and moved the formulas for what was used in the case studies into the methodology from SciNoBo. |
Added a comprehensive overview of the Reproducibility Composite Confidence Index (RCCI), including its metrics, methodologies, and data sources.
|
Thanks, that looks a lot better! Could you follow standard reference practices as the other indicators? You can add the necessary BibTex to |
|
Btw, it seems you've now also included here the reproducibility indicator. I presume this should be removed from this PR in favour of PR #93 , right? |
|
I’ve fixed the references, added the items in |
|
I think you forgot to push the changes in |
|
Ah, you've pushed them separately here #94 I guess? I'll merge it in here. Sorry, if I'm making this more difficult for you. |
|
I've merged the references, and cleaned it up a bit, I think it's good to go as is now. Thanks! |
@vtraag i created this new academic indicator based on what we do in the "EMERGING TOPICS Case Study" for topic analysis and topic persistence.