Improvements checks for arguments numbers

[Doc94]

https://canary.discord.com/channels/289587909051416579/925530366192779286/1436805929810268160

[Toffikk]

maybe it'd be better to rename the class to something like Validations or ValuePreconditions? it could also be FloatPreconditions or smth but not sure if there aren't more types planned to be added to this...

[Doc94]

maybe it'd be better to rename the class to something like Validations or ValuePreconditions? it could also be FloatPreconditions or smth but not sure if there aren't more types planned to be added to this...

i think the idea is add more checks.. but i found another class with similar use.. then i move to this for now.

[jpenilla]

asArgument[Condition] -> require[Condition]

This follows the pattern of Objects.requireNonNull, etc.

[Doc94]

asArgument[Condition] -> require[Condition]

This follows the pattern of Objects.requireNonNull, etc.

only the asArgument methods not? also.... what about requireArgument (ex: requireArgumentMin, requireArgumentRange) for make clear its intended for Arguments.