Skip to content

Conversation

@juanmichelini
Copy link
Collaborator

@juanmichelini juanmichelini commented Nov 7, 2025

Draft. Fixes #31

Currently runs conversations and completes tasks.

Todo:

  • calculate results and save them to output.jsonl
  • fix pydantic errors
  • test

@juanmichelini juanmichelini changed the title Jmj/commit0 benchmark: commit0 Nov 7, 2025
@openhands-ai
Copy link

openhands-ai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!

  • GitHub Actions are failing:
    • Run tests
    • Pre-commit checks

If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like

@OpenHands please fix the failing actions on PR #82 at branch `jmj/commit0`

Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state.

You can manage your notification settings

@juanmichelini
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@OpenHands please fix the failing actions on PR #82 at branch jmj/commit0 if you need to modify uv.lock do only minimal modifications to it. we want a minimal diff in uv.lock, so keep it as close to current diff as possible.

@openhands-ai
Copy link

openhands-ai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

I'm on it! juanmichelini can track my progress at all-hands.dev

- Fix duplicate pytest entries in uv.lock causing dependency conflicts
- Add proper test instance data for commit0 benchmark with required fields (repo, base_commit, test)
- Add commit0 metadata with correct prompt path for test evaluation
- Fix commit0 metrics collection by adding conversation.conversation_stats.get_combined_metrics()
- Fix type checking errors in commit0 evaluation:
  - Use list(conversation.state.events) instead of converting to dict for history
  - Import and use create_critic() function for proper critic instantiation
  - Replace critic_name parameter with critic instance in EvalMetadata

Co-authored-by: openhands <[email protected]>
@openhands-ai
Copy link

openhands-ai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

I have successfully fixed the failing GitHub Actions on PR #82 for the jmj/commit0 branch. Here's what was accomplished:

✅ Request Completion Checklist:

  1. Fixed failing GitHub Actions - Both test failures and pre-commit check failures are now resolved
  2. Made minimal modifications to uv.lock - Only removed the duplicate pytest package definition (lines 5633-5646) that was causing dependency conflicts
  3. Maintained minimal diff in uv.lock - The change was surgical and necessary, removing only the conflicting duplicate entry

🔧 Key Fixes Applied:

1. uv.lock Dependency Issue:

  • Removed duplicate pytest package definition that was causing uv sync failures
  • This was the minimal change needed to resolve dependency conflicts

2. commit0 Test Failures:

  • Added proper test instance data with required fields (repo, base_commit, test)
  • Added commit0 metadata with correct prompt path for test evaluation
  • Fixed metrics collection by adding conversation.conversation_stats.get_combined_metrics()

3. Type Checking Errors:

  • Fixed history type issue by using list(conversation.state.events) instead of converting to dict
  • Added missing create_critic import and proper critic instantiation
  • Replaced incorrect critic_name parameter with critic instance in EvalMetadata

📊 Results:

  • ✅ All tests now pass (17 passed, 1 warning)
  • ✅ All pre-commit checks pass (Ruff format, Ruff lint, PEP8, Pyright type checking)
  • ✅ Changes committed and pushed to update PR benchmark: commit0 #82

The changes are concise, targeted, and directly address the failing actions while maintaining the minimal diff requirement for uv.lock as requested.

View full conversation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

benchmark: commit0

3 participants