-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
[16.0][IMP] fieldservice_geoengie: Fix vector Layer related Errors #1453
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
anusriNPS
wants to merge
1
commit into
OCA:16.0
Choose a base branch
from
PyTech-SRL:16.0-fix-geoview
base: 16.0
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+103
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| geospatial https://github.com/OCA/geospatial refs/pull/417/head 9825f67d128918294b67b74d324d1e6d3259399b |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
chore (non-blocking): I see these elsewhere in the code as well, but I suspect they may have remained from previous versions, as I cannot find values of
ttypematching some of these.On a fresh odoo installation, opening a shell and inspecting
env["ir.model.fields"]._fields["ttype"].selectionI get the following fieldsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
env["ir.model.fields"]._fields["ttype"].selection- list all availablettypevalues.fieldservice_geoenginesupports only fields based onSUPPORTED_ATTandNUM_ATTwhich is used in domain to filter fromttypevalues.ttypewill not match the fields ofsupported_attandnum_attvariables and it should list all available types.ttypelist seems right and this is my understanding. Please correct me, if my views differ from your thoughts.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I probably wasn't very clear. I didn't mean to imply that fields should be added to
SUPPORTED_ATT, but rather that some may be removed (maybe?), likeinteger_big,relatedandfunction.Either way, non-blocking.