[19.0][MIG] edi_storage_oca: Migration to 19.0#254
Open
[19.0][MIG] edi_storage_oca: Migration to 19.0#254
Conversation
Ack files should be treated as incoming records. Receive files is not handled yet by the framework and will be added soon.
* A cron job check related storage on edi backends to create the needed exchange files. * Add basic receive component.
…all runtime fixes.
…filenames from storage. Also extend help in `exchange_filename_pattern` field to clarify usage.
when a file is processed the listener will move it to the done directory or the error directory based on the result of processing the file.
…n edi backend form
…ent. checker is only relevant for output direction.
…ge.record to avoid moving files after processing
Enable any internal user to trigger creation of EDI records without EDI Manager group nor read access to fs.storage
When relying on listing all files in a dir, if there's a missing trailing slash no file will be found.
It was controlled later by fs.exists, but this code was incompatible with some fsspecs.
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Van den Broeck <[email protected]>
Member
|
/ocabot migration edi_storage_oca |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
18 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NOTE:
install of 'fsspec' Python package does not auto-install 'packaging' package and also it is not mentioned in any requirements.txt, but 'fs_storage' module installation fails because of missing 'packaging' for me
if somebody has a hint please feel free to post it here.