Skip to content

Conversation

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

@TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik commented Jan 1, 2026

Create a first beta release for NorESM2.3

  • Update BLOM tag to v1.6.13
  • Update CAM tag to cam_noresm2_3_v1.0.0j
  • Update CIME tag to cime5.6.10_NorESM2_3_r7

Test results, comparing with noresm2_3_alpha03 tag:

  • prealpha_noresm
    • Expected namelist changes for CAM
    • Expected BLOM namelist changes
    • Baseline differences -- okay?
  • aux_cam_noresm
    • Expected namelist changes in CAM
    • Expected baseline changes
  • aux_blom_noresm: [3/4] tests PASS
    • Expected FAIL for ERP_Ld3_P256.T62_tn14.NOINY.betzy_intel
    • Expected NLFAIL for 3 tests

@gold2718 gold2718 marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2026 14:43
@gold2718 gold2718 requested review from adagj and gold2718 January 9, 2026 14:43
@gold2718 gold2718 moved this from Todo to In Progress in NorESM Development Jan 10, 2026
@gold2718
Copy link

@TomasTorsvik, can you check to see if the BLOM namelist changes are okay in the prealpha suite? Also, I'm not sure how to evaluate the baseline changes. I think the aux_cam ones are okay.

/cluster/work/users/goldy/camtest/test_prealpha_noresm_test_noresm23_beta01

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor Author

TomasTorsvik commented Jan 11, 2026

@gold2718 - I see there are changes related to the extended nitrogen cycle, which is now enabled by default. Also changes to the sediment spinup. It looks OK to me.

I don't think the baseline differences are related to BLOM, since I only get NLFAIL when running aux_blom.

I see you are doing baseline comparison relative to noresm2_3_alpha03_v1.7.2, but I think it is more correct to compare with noresm2_3_alpha03 baseline. The v1.7.2 is a BLOM branch with more changes than the v1.6.X, intended to be compatible with NorESM2.3, but not the default option, as it is further removed from the CMIP6 configuration.

@gold2718 gold2718 requested review from mvertens and removed request for adagj January 11, 2026 20:07
Copy link

@gold2718 gold2718 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks okay. We still have some clean-up and documentation to do for release.

@gold2718 gold2718 added this to the NorESM2.3 milestone Jan 11, 2026
@TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik merged commit c32d3e2 into noresm2_3_develop Jan 11, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in NorESM Development Jan 11, 2026
@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gold2718 , @mvertens - Should I tag this as noresm2_3_beta01?

@TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik deleted the pr-noresm2_3_beta01 branch January 11, 2026 21:08
@gold2718
Copy link

@gold2718 , @mvertens - Should I tag this as noresm2_3_beta01?

I think so because of the undone items (documentation plus this list).

@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Jan 13, 2026

NorESM (prealpha) baselines here: /cluster/shared/noresm/noresm_baselines/noresm_develop/noresm2_3_beta01
CAM baselines here: /cluster/shared/noresm/noresm_baselines/cam_develop/noresm2_3_beta01

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor Author

BLOM baselines here: /cluster/shared/noresm/noresm_baselines/blom_develop/noresm2_3_beta01

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants