Skip to content

noresm3_0_beta09: Update CTSM, BLOM #751

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
gold2718 merged 4 commits into from
Dec 17, 2025
Merged

noresm3_0_beta09: Update CTSM, BLOM #751

gold2718 merged 4 commits into from
Dec 17, 2025

Conversation

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link

@mvdebolskiy mvdebolskiy commented Dec 11, 2025 •
edited by gold2718
Loading

Testing:

  • prealpha_noresm all PASS (new baseline noresm_develop/noresm3_0_beta09)
  • aux_cam_noresm
    • several expected BASELINE and NLCOMP failures
    • several unexpected SUBMIT failures due to unavailability of input data from new NCAR server. To be fixed in beta09a
  • aux_clm_noresm all PASS (new baseline ctsm_develop/ctsm5.4.002_noresm_v1)
  • aux_blom_noresm all PASS (new baseline blom_develop/noresm3_0_beta09)

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

TomasTorsvik commented Dec 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@mvdebolskiy - We have one more BLOM update, which is also non-answer changing. Could we also include that one?

tomast@login-3.betzy:.../tomast/noresm/nor3_b08-v1.12.23 
$ ./cs.status.20251211_195911_hy1j9n -s
20251211_195911_hy1j9n: 3 tests
  PASS ERS_Ld3.T62_tn21.NOINY.betzy_intel
  NLFAIL SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOIIAJRAOC1850.betzy_intel
  NLFAIL SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_intel

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

TomasTorsvik commented Dec 11, 2025

@mvdebolskiy - Let me know if you want me to run the aux_blom_noresm test for this PR.

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Author

mvdebolskiy commented Dec 11, 2025

I am running all the tests right now.

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

TomasTorsvik commented Dec 11, 2025

OK, the v1.12.23 BLOM tag can also wait until the next noresm3_0_beta10 update, if you are already running the tests.

@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Dec 11, 2025

If the update is to CTSM 5.4, why is the tag name still 5.3?

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Author

mvdebolskiy commented Dec 12, 2025

@mvdebolskiy - We have one more BLOM update, which is also non-answer changing. Could we also include that one?

tomast@login-3.betzy:.../tomast/noresm/nor3_b08-v1.12.23 
$ ./cs.status.20251211_195911_hy1j9n -s
20251211_195911_hy1j9n: 3 tests
  PASS ERS_Ld3.T62_tn21.NOINY.betzy_intel
  NLFAIL SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOIIAJRAOC1850.betzy_intel
  NLFAIL SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_intel

Yes, I can include it. I have to rerun prealpha anyway.

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Author

mvdebolskiy commented Dec 12, 2025

If the update is to CTSM 5.4, why is the tag name still 5.3?

No, I haven't merged the ctsm PR yet, was generating baselines. will be done in couple of hours. Should I run aux_cam too?

@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Dec 12, 2025

No, I haven't merged the ctsm PR yet, was generating baselines. will be done in couple of hours. Should I run aux_cam too?

Are you worried about CAM functioning with this PR? If so, running some tests would be great. Often (e.g., for a BLOM update), I just make new aux_cam_noresm baselines after the tag is made.

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

TomasTorsvik commented Dec 16, 2025

Since testing has been carried out with BLOM v1.12.22, I suggest to stick to this version for noresm3_0_beta09 and leave the update to v1.12.23 for later.

@kjetilaas kjetilaas mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2025
Open
@mvertens
Copy link

mvertens commented Dec 16, 2025

@TomasTorsvik @gold2718 - note that cice in this PR is noresm_cice6_6_0_20250522_v1 not noresm_cice6_6_0_20250522_v3. I changed this in the documentation. Not noresm_cice6_6_0_20250522_v3 as was originally here. However, this is not in the PR that @mvdebolskiy has. I have done all my testing with noresm_cice6_6_0_20250522_v1. What should we do?

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Author

mvdebolskiy commented Dec 16, 2025

@mvertens I can fix this. Did the module get fixed?

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Author

mvdebolskiy commented Dec 16, 2025

@mvertens the name in the header is wrong. The cice checkout is correct. It's the latest cice from beta08.

@mvertens
Copy link

mvertens commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@mvdebolskiy - when I look at the .gitmodules file from the head of your PR I see the following:

submodule "cice6"]
path = components/cice
url = https://github.com/NorESMhub/NorESM_CICE.git
fxtag = noresm_cice6_6_1_20251129_v1
fxrequired = ToplevelRequired
fxDONOTUSEurl = https://github.com/NorESMhub/NorESM_CICE.git

This would point to the same cice as in beta08. But I thought we wanted the changes from v1->v3 for cice. We could certainly just put this into noresm3_0_beta10 since the testing is almost complete.

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

TomasTorsvik commented Dec 16, 2025

I have created new baselines for aux_blom_noresm.

RUNDIR: /cluster/work/users/tomast/noresm/nor3_b09-rc1
BASELINE: /cluster/shared/noresm/noresm_baselines/blom_develop/noresm3_0_beta09

All tests PASS except the 4 expected FAIL tests:

$ ./cs.status.20251216_191202_b9tfxn -s
20251216_191202_b9tfxn: 22 tests
  PASS ERI_C2.TL319_tn14.NOIIAJRAOC.betzy_intel
  FAIL ERP_Ld3_P256.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_gnu
  FAIL ERP_Ld3_P256.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_intel
  PASS ERR_Ld3.TL319_tn14.NOIIAJRAOC.betzy_gnu
  PASS ERS_Ld3.T62_tn14.N2NOINYOC.betzy_intel
  PASS ERS_Ld3.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_intel
  FAIL ERS_Ld3.T62_tn14_wtn14nw.NOINY_WW3.betzy_gnu.blom-wavice
  PASS ERS_Ld3.T62_tn14_wtn14nw.NOINY_WW3.betzy_intel.blom-wavice
  PASS ERS_Ld3.T62_tn21.NOINY.betzy_intel
  PASS ERS_Ld3.TL319_tn05.NOIIAJRA.betzy_intel
  PASS ERS_Ld5.T62_tn14.NOINY.betzy_intel.blom-woa_nuopc
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOIIA.betzy_intel
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOIIAJRAOC1850.betzy_intel
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOIIAJRAOC20TR.betzy_intel
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOIIAOC.betzy_intel
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_gnu
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14.NOINYOC.betzy_intel
  FAIL SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14_wtn14nw.NOINYOC_WW3.betzy_gnu.blom-wavice
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.T62_tn14_wtn14nw.NOINYOC_WW3.betzy_intel.blom-wavice
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.TL319_tn14.NOIIAJRARYF6162OC.betzy_intel
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.TL319_tn14.NOIIAJRARYF8485OC.betzy_gnu
  PASS SMS_D_Ld1.TL319_tn14.NOIIAJRARYF8485OC.betzy_intel

@TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik added this to the noresm3_0_beta09 milestone Dec 16, 2025
@TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik linked an issue Dec 16, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
noresm3_0_beta09 #749
Closed
12 tasks
@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Author

mvdebolskiy commented Dec 16, 2025

@mvertens _v3 has date 250522, it's older than latest cice.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to In Progress in NorESM Development Dec 16, 2025
@mvertens
Copy link

mvertens commented Dec 16, 2025

@mvdebolskiy - thanks. The name in the PR summary was incorrect. As you point out - the tag we want is noresm_cice6_6_1_20251129_v1 - which is what your .gitmodules has. Sorry for my confusion.

@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I am getting missing inputdata files for some tests.
One example is lnd/clm2/surfdata_esmf/ctsm5.4.0/landuse.timeseries_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850-2023_78pfts_c251022.nc
Where is this file, check_input_data cannot find it?

@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Dec 16, 2025

Answer, it is on the new NCAR server which is not yet configured into our ccs_config_noresm/config_inputdata.xml

https://osdf-data.gdex.ucar.edu/ncar/gdex/d651077/cesmdata/inputdata/lnd/clm2/surfdata_esmf/ctsm5.4.0/landuse.timeseries_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850-2023_78pfts_c251022.nc

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

TomasTorsvik commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@gold2718 , @mvdebolskiy , @mvertens
I "jumped the gun" and fired of a test run with CLM cold start: NorESMhub/noresm3_dev_simulations#298
At least, this seems to start up and run without issues.

@gold2718 gold2718 merged commit 7a28488 into NorESMhub:noresm_develop Dec 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in NorESM Development Dec 17, 2025
@gold2718 gold2718 deleted the pr-noresm3_0_beta09 branch December 17, 2025 14:13
@gold2718
Copy link

gold2718 commented Dec 17, 2025

Tagged as noresm3_0_beta09

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mvertens mvertens mvertens approved these changes

@TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik TomasTorsvik approved these changes

@gold2718 gold2718 Awaiting requested review from gold2718

@matsbn matsbn Awaiting requested review from matsbn

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

NorESM Development
Status: Done
NorESM3.0 model development - tags
Status: Done

Milestone

noresm3_0_beta09

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

noresm3_0_beta09

4 participants

@mvdebolskiy @TomasTorsvik @gold2718 @mvertens