-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.4k
freecad: enable ifc unconditionally #422675
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
fa28145 to
1956444
Compare
pkgs/by-name/fr/freecad/package.nix
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: maybe keep the list sorted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seriously? Not even whitespace changes, literally just orderin? Make a documentation suggestion if you actually care about these things, don't nit on random trivial PRs!
Anyways, fixed...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry if this comment wasn't clear. I intentionally made a comment (and not a request for change) and prefixed my comment with "Nit". Indeed, such comments should not be blocking and you are free to ignore it as you wish.
Maybe I should have made it even more clear. Sorry once again for the misunderstanding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, it was marked nit, and not marked as requested change. Personally i find it weird if all someone reviews is trivial nits and nothing substantial: I am happy to hear nits if i have to touch changes anyways, but if nits are the only complaint they quickly feel overly pedantic. But fair enough, you did say nit, lets not get stuck on semantics here. Thanks for taking the time to review this change set, you could have ignored it completely too tbf.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I wanted to follow-up with a merge, but the PR slipped from my sight. Again sorry for the unusual friction.
closes NixOS#370121 follow-up to NixOS#330190 The BIM workspace depends on ifc, there is little reason why it should be conditional to a flag that causes a from-source rebuild. It should just be always enabled.
1956444 to
f772e38
Compare
|
GaetanLepage
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @LordGrimmauld !
closes #370121
follow-up to #330190
The BIM workspace depends on ifc, there is little reason why it should be conditional to a flag that causes a from-source rebuild. It should just be always enabled.
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.