Skip to content

Archive aerosol analysis b products#4437

Merged
CoryMartin-NOAA merged 1 commit intoNOAA-EMC:dev/gcafs.v1from
ypwang19:feature/anl_b_prod
Jan 14, 2026
Merged

Archive aerosol analysis b products#4437
CoryMartin-NOAA merged 1 commit intoNOAA-EMC:dev/gcafs.v1from
ypwang19:feature/anl_b_prod

Conversation

@ypwang19
Copy link
Contributor

@ypwang19 ypwang19 commented Jan 14, 2026

Description

This PR turns on the archiving of aerosol analysis b products, given that GCAFS/GCDAS analysis b products are enabled in a recent PR #4407.

Type of change

  • New feature (adds functionality)

Change characteristics

  • Is this change expected to change outputs (e.g. value changes to existing outputs, new files stored in COM, files removed from COM, filename changes, additions/subtractions to archives)? YES
    • GCAFS
  • Is this a breaking change (a change in existing functionality)? NO
  • Does this change require a documentation update? NO
  • Does this change require an update to any of the following submodules? NO
    • EMC verif-global
    • GDAS
    • GFS-utils
    • GSI
    • GSI-monitor
    • GSI-utils
    • UFS-utils
    • UFS-weather-model
    • wxflow

How has this been tested?

  • Cycled C96_gcafs_cycled on Hera

Checklist

  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have documented my code, including function, input, and output descriptions
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • New and existing tests pass with my changes
  • This change is covered by an existing CI test or a new one has been added
  • Any new scripts have been added to the .github/CODEOWNERS file with owners
  • I have made corresponding changes to the system documentation if necessary

@CoryMartin-NOAA CoryMartin-NOAA merged commit ed1e343 into NOAA-EMC:dev/gcafs.v1 Jan 14, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants