Rename a bunch of jgdas/exgdas to jglobal/exglobal#4293
Rename a bunch of jgdas/exgdas to jglobal/exglobal#4293DavidHuber-NOAA merged 4 commits intoNOAA-EMC:developfrom
Conversation
RussTreadon-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks straightforward. The real test is that g-w CI with these changes (a) runs without error and (b) generates identical output.
I don't think any of the g-w CI cases run the enkf in both the gfs and gdas cycles. Does GFS v17 run in this mode? If yes, can we run a lo-res GFS v17 test to confirm everything works as intended? If no, should we consider modifying an existing g-w CI test to cover this case?
Conditionally approve pending satisfactory results from g-w CI and, potentially, other tests.
|
@aerorahul It looks like a shellcheck from your previous PR (#4267) snuck through. Can you please address this warning: |
done via fd0cd09 |
|
Merging based on successful tests performed by @aerorahul. |
Description
This PR:
Type of change
Change characteristics
How has this been tested?
Tested on GaeaC6 at:
/gpfs/f6/drsa-precip4/world-shared/Rahul.Mahajan/RUNTESTS/gw-4241Checklist