Skip to content

Conversation

@rcaspart
Copy link
Member

This pull request addresses the wrong definition of allocation and utilization for the drones reported in #87 . The calculations are set to mirror the definition used in COBalD.

Closes #87

@rcaspart rcaspart added the bug Something isn't working label May 11, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #94 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #94   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.89%   59.89%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines         763      763           
  Branches      111      111           
=======================================
  Hits          457      457           
  Misses        282      282           
  Partials       24       24           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lapis/drone.py 74.50% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 989b805...0c4a1e5. Read the comment docs.

@eileen-kuehn
Copy link
Member

Hi @rcaspart, thanks for your contribution :) I will have a look after I made a release for the thesis of Tabea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inverted definition of allocation and utilization

3 participants