Repository navigation
[3/5] Refactor: extract the charged fragment type annotation and the pointer reannotation #436
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bd03ca3
Characterize flatten_fragments before the memory refactor
9a61541
Make the fragment parsing helpers private
45870d6
Extract the charged fragment type annotation and the pointer reannota…
d07f561
Pin flatten_fragments against a hand-written library
8be793d
Document the fragment numbering convention
8b43cf6
Assert against a hand-written library
2b61b97
Assert the flat fragment frames with assert_frame_equal
dcb112f
Fold the repeated annotation tiling into a loop
dbb7ece
Merge test/flatten-fragments-characterization into refactor/private-f…
4def3fa
Point the test at the private helper name
88f75d7
Merge refactor/private-fragment-parsing-helpers into refactor/annotat…
f290826
Assert every flat frame with assert_frame_equal
52e3dbb
Merge test/flatten-fragments-characterization into refactor/private-f…
d352bb0
Merge refactor/private-fragment-parsing-helpers into refactor/annotat…
6fa53b1
Compare the long precursor maxima and dtypes as series
537a71f
Merge test/flatten-fragments-characterization into refactor/private-f…
e2b436d
Merge refactor/private-fragment-parsing-helpers into refactor/annotat…
8b60af7
Merge main into refactor/private-fragment-parsing-helpers
5411e9a
Merge refactor/private-fragment-parsing-helpers into refactor/annotat…
8aca304
Merge refactor/private-fragment-parsing-helpers into refactor/annotat…
0e540be
Merge main into refactor/annotate-charged-frag-types
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"tiling the typed arrays keeps their dtype" -> I feel this is redundant? like "
a = 1+1 # this will stay an int" ? also, second part of comment references previous implementation.(I am not saying the information is not valuable, it's just that code is not the right place for it .. this would be a good example of the PR author commenting his own code to guide the review)