You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Allowing double constants would make borrowings and compound words easier to form, for example fimma. To distinguish these words without ambiguity, the pronunciation of the double constant can be aspirated and ideally held for a period perceptibly longer than normal. So fimma would sound like fimha.
I do not believe this would cause any conflicts with current morphology because it places the h sound such that it is preceded by a constant instead of a vowel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another way to do this would be in the Japanese fashion, adding the full syllabic form of the consonant before it. For example, fimma would be /fi.m.ma/. With your proposal, it would probably make more sense to just call them aspirated consonants and write fim'a.
Allowing double constants would make borrowings and compound words easier to form, for example
fimma
. To distinguish these words without ambiguity, the pronunciation of the double constant can be aspirated and ideally held for a period perceptibly longer than normal. Sofimma
would sound like fimha.I do not believe this would cause any conflicts with current morphology because it places the
h
sound such that it is preceded by a constant instead of a vowel.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: