Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LibWebView: Port to Windows #3002

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Conversation

stasoid
Copy link
Contributor

@stasoid stasoid commented Dec 21, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@AtkinsSJ AtkinsSJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A general comment on your PRs lately: it'd be helpful if the commit message explained why you made the changes you did. Specifically here the removal of the static asserts. If someone in future wonders why they're gone, (presumably they were added for a reason originally,) and the git blame just tells them "Port to Windows", it doesn't explain why Windows doesn't like these, or the trade offs you made, etc.

I've had a skim of a few of your PRs and generally the commits are clear, but the final "LibFoo: Port to Windows" commits tend to have changes that could use more explanation, especially for someone like me who doesn't know about Windows' differences.

@stasoid
Copy link
Contributor Author

stasoid commented Dec 21, 2024

These static asserts were placed by @ADKaster just to mark places that might need attention when porting to Windows. They don't even compile - not because the assert fails, but because there is no such type IPC::TransportSocket on Windows (IPC::TransportSocketWindows is used instead). They are essentially elaborate FIXMEs.

@ADKaster
Copy link
Member

They are fixmes yes. But they do need attention when Mach IPC is a thing as well, not just windows

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

@github-actions github-actions bot added stale and removed stale labels Jan 12, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

@github-actions github-actions bot added stale and removed stale labels Feb 4, 2025
@stasoid stasoid force-pushed the LibWebView branch 6 times, most recently from 257aaab to f4747c0 Compare February 13, 2025 15:23
@stasoid stasoid marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 15:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added the conflicts Pull request has merge conflicts that need resolution label Feb 14, 2025
Copy link

Your pull request has conflicts that need to be resolved before it can be reviewed and merged. Make sure to rebase your branch on top of the latest master.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the conflicts Pull request has merge conflicts that need resolution label Feb 14, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

@github-actions github-actions bot added stale conflicts Pull request has merge conflicts that need resolution and removed stale labels Mar 9, 2025
Copy link

Your pull request has conflicts that need to be resolved before it can be reviewed and merged. Make sure to rebase your branch on top of the latest master.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the conflicts Pull request has merge conflicts that need resolution label Mar 16, 2025
@stasoid stasoid force-pushed the LibWebView branch 2 times, most recently from 12c649f to 758a893 Compare March 19, 2025 05:02
@ADKaster ADKaster merged commit 2dd657f into LadybirdBrowser:master Mar 20, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants