Skip to content

Conversation

@ztq1996
Copy link
Contributor

@ztq1996 ztq1996 commented Nov 20, 2025

Problem & Solution Description (including issue #)

Code Quality

  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • I have written unit tests or justified all instances of #pragma: no cover; in the case of a bugfix, a new test that breaks as a result of the bug has been added
  • My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation for future maintainers; the change is reflected in applicable demos/tutorials (with output cleared!) and added/updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format
  • Any breaking changes, described above, are accompanied by backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (db00353) to head (3c1ee69).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #64   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            8         8           
  Lines          182       182           
=========================================
  Hits           182       182           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@eacharles
Copy link
Collaborator

You can close this. I just switched the deps to directly include the algorithms that are used in the various pipelines.

@ztq1996 ztq1996 closed this Dec 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants