Added Opb to drell-yan#122
Open
TommasoArmadillo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the Drell-Yan theory file the operator
Opbwas included inOpdi, while according to our flavour assumptions they have to be separated.I modified
SMEFTatNLOin order to split it fromOpdi, I cross-check at LO againstSMEFTsimand I computed both the new contributions involvingOpband recomputed the ones withOpdi. In the attached pdf there are the plots of NP contributions I modified, with the SM, they look ok.I also modified the high-lumi projections.
comparison_LO_NLO.pdf