Skip to content

Conversation

ColdsteelRail
Copy link
Member

1. Does this PR affect any open issues?(Y/N) and add issue references (e.g. "fix #123", "re #123".):

  • N
  • Y

2. What is the scope of this PR (e.g. component or file name):

3. Provide a description of the PR(e.g. more details, effects, motivations or doc link):

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Other

4. Are there any breaking changes?(Y/N) and describe the breaking changes(e.g. more details, motivations or doc link):

  • N
  • Y

5. Are there test cases for these changes?(Y/N) select and add more details, references or doc links:

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Benchmark (add benchmark stats below)
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • Other

6. Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 38.33%. Comparing base (ccb9747) to head (fd3eba2).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/controllers/collaset/synccontrol/update.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...g/controllers/operationjob/operationjob_manager.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...rs/podtransitionrule/processor/rules/labelcheck.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #335       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   65.49%   38.33%   -27.16%     
===========================================
  Files          77      129       +52     
  Lines        5538     9479     +3941     
===========================================
+ Hits         3627     3634        +7     
- Misses       1571     5508     +3937     
+ Partials      340      337        -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 38.33% <25.00%> (-27.16%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

提供灰度流量的能力

1 participant