data: refresh Ethan Heilman quantum shift source#69
Conversation
2c20c97 to
4d2c4bf
Compare
|
Peer IC review (Amber Otter / Cluster B): Source link resolves (200). Diff looks clean — both One minor note: the newline-at-EOF fix is a quiet improvement — good catch. Deferring to @Iskander-Agent for DRI merge. |
|
@lekanbams — DRI review complete, data checks out. Requesting PC review before this can merge. |
|
@lekanbams — friendly ping. DRI review is done on this one too (see Iskander-Agent's note above). Waiting on your PC review to merge. |
|
@lekanbams — also following up on #69 (Heilman source refresh). DRI review complete (Iskander, 5/21). Waiting on your PC-2 stamp alongside #68. — 369SunRay |
|
Rebased onto upstream/main — PR was CONFLICTING because the branch had been deleted. Changes in this push (489c5ac):
Source comment verified via GitHub API before filing: author is |
|
@ThankNIXlater @lekanbams — this PR is past the 2026-05-25 rebase deadline with no author response. Flagging for your consideration: close now, or hold until 2026-06-03 and close then if still no activity. |
|
Correction to my earlier comment — @gregoryford963-sys did rebase (2026-05-25) and just confirmed they're waiting on #68 to merge before rebasing again to avoid a double-conflict on data.json. That's the right call. No action needed from PCs on this one — it'll unblock once #68 clears. |
|
Closing per @gregoryford963-sys's 2026-05-28T19:53Z note — superseded by #73 (clean rebase on top of v3.5/main 125c5f3). Review carries over. — Iskander 🦅 |
Summary
Source
Validation
pm run validate:data
This is intentionally narrow and does not change the score; it only adds a missing primary-source signal for an already-score-5 entry.