Delete Collection - SPA integration

[g-saracca]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Replicate JSF Delete Collection functionality.
Also added copy labels github action workflow.

Which issue(s) this PR closes:

• Closes Collection Page: Delete Collection #602

Suggestions on how to test this:

Step 1: Run the Development Environment

1. Execute npm i.
2. Navigate with cd packages/design-system && npm i && npm run build.
3. Return with cd ../../.
4. Ensure you have a .env file similar to .env.example, with the variable VITE_DATAVERSE_BACKEND_URL=http://localhost:8000.
5. Navigate with cd dev-env.
6. Start the environment using ./run-env.sh unstable.
7. To verify the environment, visit http://localhost:8000 and check your local Dataverse installation.

Step 2: Test the feature

1. Verify that in the root collection edit dropdown there is no Delete Collection button (even if it has no collections or datasets in it)
2. Create a collection and verify that in the edit dropdown there is a Delete Collection button.
3. Delete the collection, a toast message should appear and you should be redirected to the parent collection.
4. Create again a collection ("Test Collection") and verify that in the edit dropdown there is a Delete Collection button.
5. Create a dataset or a collection within "Test Collection".
6. Navigate to "Test Collection" and verify that in the edit dropdown there is NO Delete Collection button as the collection now has data in it.

Does this PR introduce a user interface change? If mockups are available, please link/include them here:

Yes.

Is there a release notes update needed for this change?:

No.

Additional documentation:

No.

[coveralls]

coverage: 97.716% (+0.5%) from 97.241%
when pulling ff05ab7 on feat/602-delete-collection
into fa6299a on develop.

[ekraffmiller]

@g-saracca there are merge conflicts, can you resolve?

[g-saracca]

@ekraffmiller , they are just js-dataverse package conflicts, I will resolve them after the Delete File SPA Integration is merged if its ok with you, to avoid solving conflicts twice.

[ChengShi-1]

Inspect the code and test the function on the page. Everything great! just a tiny tweak

[g-saracca]

@ChengShi-1 change made, thanks!

[ChengShi-1]

Looks good to me. approve:)