Add arm64 CI #278
Add arm64 CI #278
Conversation
| end | ||
| # When we move from Ubuntu 22.04, on ARM we should add a dependency to [email protected] and [email protected]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this was when the original plan was to not use any glibc dependency and just use the system one (which would make the baseline arm64 minimum be 2.35).
The plan seems to be now to use 2.17 which is a permanent requirement (for as long as reasonable)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Bo98 @ZhongRuoyu What version(s) of Ubuntu is using 2.35 vs. 2.17? I think it'd be nicer to just target the GitHub Actions Ubuntu runner version for now, whatever that ends up requiring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
22.04 uses 2.35, though we're not exactly going to stay on 22.04 forever so would need a glibc@whatever for whatever we end up using.
2.17 would support every single aarch64/arm64 Linux OS out there (to our knowledge). 2.35 would only support OS versions since mid-2022, with no support at all for RHEL (their latest version uses 2.34).
Overall though I don't really mind. Losing RHEL is probably somewhat restrictive though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Losing RHEL for ARM specifically seems fine. I think we should aim to just support Ubuntu >=22.04 for now.
It's likely to be a long time before we're doing anything other than Portable Ruby and Homebrew/brew basic support.
| end | ||
| # When we move from Ubuntu 22.04, on ARM we should add a dependency to [email protected] and [email protected]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Bo98 @ZhongRuoyu What version(s) of Ubuntu is using 2.35 vs. 2.17? I think it'd be nicer to just target the GitHub Actions Ubuntu runner version for now, whatever that ends up requiring.
|
Everything builds fine. Just one interesting |
Pending changes in brew first.
Bit of a chicken-egg problem given we don't have an arm64 Homebrew Docker image yet so a temporary bootstrap step is required.