-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
add pin feature for production lines #441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
atburghardt
wants to merge
8
commits into
Helfima:dev
Choose a base branch
from
atburghardt:pin-gui-for-production-lines
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f5882cc
add pin feature for production lines
atburghardt 44719a3
upgrade version
atburghardt d4e4c36
fix copy-paste error
atburghardt 68fe092
use ifelse...
atburghardt a489006
Merge tag '0.12.14' into pin-gui-for-production-lines
atburghardt c14c9fb
finalize all Functions
atburghardt b1e4c3d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'original/dev' into pin-gui-for-producti…
atburghardt 006745e
Merge branch 'dev' into pr/441
KiwiHawk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please explain to me what this is doing and why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there is no Block given, the pin function could be called from production line view. It checks if that pin-button contained information in item3 about the needed information to find the correct production line.
Would need to debug now, to see what exactly is saved in blocks. Can do that on Monday. Should have added comments, I guess it's because I added block _id's to the buttons. There was a good reason why I did that, just can't remember now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the pin-panel is opened without a block selected, but with the whole production line the block will always be nil.
So when for example using the pipet function, the block needs to be set. Item3 holds the block id which I double check, because when opening the pin-panel, block needs to be nil and item3 has a different string (if i remember correctly)