Skip to content

HakiFedha/sheria-index

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

27 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Sheria Index: Africa Bitcoin and Digital Assets Regulatory Frameworks

Methodology and Framework
Version 1.0 | July 2026


About the Name

Sheria means law in Swahili.

The Sheria Index is a companion research project to the Africa Financial Tyranny Index (AFTI), maintained by HakiFedha as part of its commitment to producing open, freely available research that helps civil society actors across Africa understand and navigate the financial and legal environments in which they operate.

📌 Project Status: Beta / Work in Progress

The Sheria Index is actively expanding. The initial data repository is undergoing continuous verification as regulatory landscapes shift across the continent. We are systematically updating country entries, and community contributions or verified regional corrections are highly encouraged.


Data

The latest dataset is available as:


Purpose

The Sheria Index tracks the regulatory status of Bitcoin and digital assets across Africa.

It is designed to answer a question that existing regulatory trackers do not:

What does the regulatory landscape mean specifically for civil society actors?

This includes:

  • NGOs
  • journalists & researchers
  • activists
  • human rights defenders
  • whistleblowers
  • community organisers & organisations
  • independent media

Most existing crypto regulatory analysis is produced for exchanges, institutional investors, or legal compliance teams.

The Sheria Index is produced for people for whom Bitcoin is not primarily a financial opportunity, but a tool of financial sovereignty, operational continuity, and resistance to censorship.


Methodology Principles

The Sheria Index follows five core research principles:

Evidence-Based

Each country assessment is based on verifiable sources, including legislation, regulatory instruments, official government statements, international assessments, and credible research.

Country-Specific

Regulatory environments differ significantly across African countries. Each entry is independently assessed based on the country's own laws, institutions, enforcement practices, and civil society context.

Reproducible

The methodology, data fields, classification framework, and sources are publicly available so that researchers and communities can review, verify, and contribute improvements.

Transparent

The Sheria Index distinguishes between what laws formally state, how regulators interpret those laws, and how enforcement occurs in practice.

Continuously Updated

Digital asset regulation is evolving rapidly. Country entries are reviewed periodically, with updates recorded through the last_updated field and formal version releases when significant changes occur.


The Bitcoin Lens

African regulatory frameworks generally govern digital assets broadly, using terms such as:

  • virtual assets
  • crypto assets
  • digital currencies

Bitcoin is rarely singled out in legislation as its own legal category.

The Sheria Index documents the regulatory landscape as governments have defined and legislated it while analysing the implications specifically through a Bitcoin lens, consistent with HakiFedha's mission and scope.

We maintain that Bitcoin is fundamentally different from the broader digital asset category because it possesses unique properties including:

  • decentralisation
  • fixed supply
  • censorship resistance
  • absence of an issuing authority

Where regulations apply broadly to digital assets, we assess their practical implications for Bitcoin use, including:

  • self-custody
  • peer-to-peer acquisition
  • cross-border transfers

Scope

The Sheria Index covers:

  • legal status of Bitcoin and digital assets
  • regulatory classification
  • responsible regulatory authorities
  • VASP licensing requirements
  • KYC and AML obligations
  • tax treatment
  • legal status of self-custody
  • legal status of peer-to-peer trading
  • civil society risk assessment
  • practical implications for civil society
  • key legislation
  • enforcement notes
  • supporting sources

The index does not provide:

  • investment advice
  • exchange-specific compliance guidance
  • institutional legal advice except where directly relevant to civil society use

Civil Society Risk Classification

Level Description
Low No formal restrictions on Bitcoin use. No documented pattern of financial repression. P2P acquisition available without significant surveillance risk.
Low-Medium Regulatory framework developing but no material restrictions. Some surveillance risk through conventional banking channels. Monitor developments.
Medium Regulatory obligations reduce anonymity for exchange-based acquisition. Some documented financial pressure on civil society. P2P acquisition recommended.
Medium-High Tightening regulation combined with documented financial repression. Operational security strongly recommended. Self-custody essential.
High Active documented financial repression. Regulation creates significant surveillance obligations or is selectively enforced. Bitcoin self-custody and P2P are critical tools.
Critical Extreme financial repression documented at scale. State financial surveillance targets civil society. Bitcoin self-custody becomes a survival tool and conventional financial channels should be treated as compromised.

Data Fields

Field Description
country Country name
region African sub-region
legal_status Overall legal status of Bitcoin and digital assets
regulatory_classification Government classification
vasp_licensing Licensing requirements
kyc_aml_required Whether KYC/AML obligations apply
tax_treatment Tax treatment
self_custody_status Legal status of self-custody
p2p_status Legal status of peer-to-peer trading
civil_society_risk_level Risk classification
civil_society_notes Plain-language assessment
key_legislation Primary legal instruments
enforcement_notes Known enforcement patterns
last_updated Date of latest review
sources Supporting sources

Source Standards

Every country entry requires at least one credible primary or secondary source.

Accepted sources include:

  • National legislation
  • Regulatory instruments
  • Central bank statements
  • Financial regulatory authorities
  • FATF mutual evaluations
  • FATF grey-list announcements
  • Peer-reviewed academic publications
  • Reports from credible international organisations
  • Credible legal journalism
  • Credible financial journalism

The following are not accepted as primary evidence:

  • unverified social media posts
  • exchange promotional material
  • anonymous blogs
  • sources that cannot be independently verified

Handling Ambiguity

Many African countries have no comprehensive digital asset legislation.

Rather than assuming Bitcoin is either legal or prohibited, the Sheria Index records the absence of a legal framework as a finding in itself.

We distinguish between:

Classification Meaning
Explicit prohibition Law specifically prohibits Bitcoin or digital assets
Implicit prohibition No explicit ban, but regulatory guidance treats crypto as outside permitted financial activities
Legal grey zone No formal framework and inconsistent enforcement
Partial recognition Certain activities (such as taxation) recognised without comprehensive regulation
Legal, regulated Comprehensive legal framework exists

Where law and enforcement differ significantly, the Sheria Index documents both.


Update Cycle

The Sheria Index is updated on a rolling basis as regulatory developments occur.

Each country entry includes a last_updated field.

A formal version release is published whenever five or more country entries have been materially revised.


Limitations

The Sheria Index is intended for research and educational purposes.

It is not legal advice.

African regulatory environments evolve rapidly, and some jurisdictions have limited publicly available documentation.

Users should verify the current legal position before relying on this index for operational decisions and seek qualified legal advice where appropriate.


Related Resources

The Sheria Index is part of HakiFedha's broader open research ecosystem focused on Bitcoin, financial freedom, privacy, and civil society resilience.

Related resources:

Contributions

The Sheria Index is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.

Contributions, corrections, and verified updates are welcome.

Visit: https://hakifedha.org

or open an issue or pull request on this repository.

License

The mapping data and documentation are available under the terms of the central HakiFedha LICENSE.

About

Africa Bitcoin & Digital Asset Regulatory Frameworks: A civil society risk assessment index.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors