Skip to content

Conversation

@bhandarivijay-png
Copy link

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: [email protected]

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@bhandarivijay-png bhandarivijay-png requested review from a team and nityaravi as code owners January 6, 2026 04:56
@bhandarivijay-png
Copy link
Author

Hi @glasnt, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks!

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @bhandarivijay-png, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on migrating existing gsutil commands to their gcloud storage equivalents within Cloud Build configuration files. The primary goal is to standardize Google Cloud Storage operations using the more modern and integrated gcloud storage CLI, which offers benefits like better performance and consistent authentication across Google Cloud services. The changes are automated, but careful review and testing are emphasized to ensure compatibility and prevent unexpected behavior due to potential differences between the two tools.

Highlights

  • Migration to gcloud storage: This pull request initiates the migration from the legacy gsutil command-line tool to the modern gcloud storage CLI for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, aligning with Google's recommended practices for improved performance and unified authentication.
  • Automated Change: The changes in this PR were automatically generated by an agent designed to assist users in transitioning from gsutil to gcloud storage, based on an official migration guide.
  • Crucial Review and Testing Required: Despite being automated, it is critical for reviewers and authors to thoroughly test these changes. Subtle differences in command behavior (e.g., rsync deletion logic) and output structure between gsutil and gcloud storage could impact existing workflows and scripts.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly migrates gsutil rm commands to gcloud storage rm across three Cloud Build configuration files. The automated change is a direct replacement. However, I've noticed an opportunity to make the cleanup steps more robust. The current implementation will cause the build step to fail if the test log file to be deleted does not exist. I've suggested adding the --ignore-not-found flag to the gcloud storage rm commands to prevent this, ensuring the cleanup process is more resilient. This is a good practice for cleanup scripts.

- '-c'
- |
gsutil rm gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml
gcloud storage rm gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To make the cleanup step more robust, consider adding the --ignore-not-found flag. This will prevent the step from failing if the test log file doesn't exist (for example, if the test step failed before creating the log). This is generally a good practice for cleanup scripts to ensure they are idempotent and don't fail unnecessarily.

        gcloud storage rm --ignore-not-found gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml

- '-c'
- |
gsutil rm gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml
gcloud storage rm gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve the robustness of this cleanup step, I recommend adding the --ignore-not-found flag. This ensures that the build step won't fail if the specified test log file is not found in the bucket, which can happen if the preceding test step failed. This makes the cleanup logic more resilient.

        gcloud storage rm --ignore-not-found gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml

- '-c'
- |
gsutil rm gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml
gcloud storage rm gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For a more resilient cleanup process, it's a good idea to add the --ignore-not-found flag here. This will prevent the cleanup step from failing if the test log file doesn't exist, which could happen if the tests didn't run or failed to produce a log. This makes the cleanup script more reliable.

        gcloud storage rm --ignore-not-found gs://${_BUCKET_NAME}/${SHORT_SHA}_test_log.xml

@glasnt
Copy link
Collaborator

glasnt commented Jan 6, 2026

/gcbrun

@glasnt
Copy link
Collaborator

glasnt commented Jan 6, 2026

These changes read okay, but there are unrelated issues with this samples that are causing build failures.

#376 and #377 required, and this PR rebased, which should make tests succeed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants