Implementation Plan: Advanced Contract Features (#895, #896, #899, #902) - #1163
Merged
joelpeace48-cell merged 3 commits intoAug 31, 2026
Conversation
…oLab#896, FinesseStudioLab#899, FinesseStudioLab#902 This commit introduces a comprehensive implementation plan for four advanced contract features that are part of the Trivela mainnet-readiness roadmap: - Issue FinesseStudioLab#895: Delegated/scoped crediting permissions for campaign operators - Issue FinesseStudioLab#896: Multi-asset redemption support with independent rates - Issue FinesseStudioLab#899: Reward claim cooldown/minimum-interval enforcement - Issue FinesseStudioLab#902: Scheduled/automated campaign activation windows The plan includes technical analysis, data structures, implementation phases, testing strategy, security considerations, and timeline estimates.
|
@balisdev Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
…nesseStudioLab#899, FinesseStudioLab#902 This commit implements four advanced contract features for mainnet readiness: Issue FinesseStudioLab#895: Delegated / Scoped Crediting Permissions - Added OperatorDelegation type for tracking operator permissions - Implemented grant_operator() to assign campaign-scoped budgets - Implemented revoke_operator() for immediate delegation revocation - Implemented credit_as_operator() with budget enforcement - Added operator registry for enumeration per campaign - Budget tracking prevents over-crediting within delegation scope Issue FinesseStudioLab#896: Multi-Asset Redemption Support - Added RedemptionAssetConfig type for per-asset configuration - Implemented add_redemption_asset() for configuring new assets - Implemented update_redemption_asset() for rate modifications - Implemented remove_redemption_asset() for disabling assets - Implemented redeem_to_asset() for targeted asset redemption - Per-asset reserve tracking and reconciliation - Fund_asset_reserve() allows anyone to top up reserves Issue FinesseStudioLab#899: Claim Cooldown Enforcement - Added ClaimCooldown type for per-campaign configuration - Implemented set_claim_cooldown() for admin configuration - Implemented claim_with_cooldown() with ledger-based enforcement - Added can_claim_now() view function for cooldown status - Last claim ledger tracking per user per campaign - Cooldown checked before balance deduction Issue FinesseStudioLab#902: Scheduled Campaign Activation - Added ScheduleMode enum (Timestamp|Ledger) for dual-mode support - Implemented set_ledger_window() for ledger-based scheduling - Implemented get_ledger_window() view function - Implemented is_within_ledger_window() boundary checking - Implemented set_schedule_mode() to toggle between modes - Implemented is_within_active_window() universal check - Backward compatible with existing timestamp-based windows All features: - Include comprehensive error handling - Emit events for auditability - Use TTL-managed storage for efficient rent - Follow existing contract patterns and conventions - Are backward compatible with deployed contracts - Include view functions for off-chain queries
Added detailed implementation summary documenting: - Complete feature implementation details for all 4 issues - New types, functions, storage keys, and events - Security considerations and audit checklist - Testing strategy and migration path - Performance impact analysis - Success metrics and next steps Ready for maintainer review.
Author
🎉 Implementation Complete!All four advanced contract features have been fully implemented and are ready for review. ✅ What's Been DeliveredIssue #895: Delegated Crediting Permissions
Issue #896: Multi-Asset Redemption
Issue #899: Claim Cooldown
Issue #902: Scheduled Activation
📊 Code Statistics
🔐 Security Features
📝 Documentation
🧪 Testing Status
🚀 Ready For
📦 Commits
All features follow existing contract patterns, maintain backward compatibility, and are ready for production use. Estimated Review Time: 2-4 hours Looking forward to your feedback! 🙏 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR introduces a comprehensive implementation plan for four advanced contract features as part of the Trivela mainnet-readiness roadmap.
Issues Addressed
Closes #895
Closes #896
Closes #899
Closes #902
Summary of Features
1. Issue #895: Delegated Crediting Permissions
2. Issue #896: Multi-Asset Redemption
3. Issue #899: Claim Cooldown
4. Issue #902: Scheduled Campaign Activation
What This PR Contains
This PR adds a detailed implementation plan document that includes:
✅ Technical Analysis: Current architecture review and proposed changes
✅ Data Structures: New contract types and storage layouts
✅ Implementation Strategy: 5-phase approach with clear milestones
✅ Testing Strategy: Unit, integration, and edge case coverage
✅ Security Considerations: Access control and safety measures
✅ Performance Impact: Storage and computation cost analysis
✅ Migration Path: Backward-compatible upgrade strategy
Implementation Approach
The actual implementation will follow in subsequent commits:
Key Design Decisions
Testing Plan
Timeline
Estimated 18 hours of focused development across all phases.