Skip to content

Conversation

pjfanning
Copy link
Member

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Makes sense. OTOH, almost tempted to revert original change from 2.17, re-do for 2.18.

In hindsight should probably should have heeded my own warnings and NOT merge #4430 in a patch.

@JooHyukKim
Copy link
Member

Just in case, could you test with this branch version? @wdallastella

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder merged commit fe8ce08 into 2.17 Jun 5, 2024
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder deleted the lock-issue branch June 5, 2024 00:47
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

I'll merge this first, forward, and then consider revert just in 2.17 (but move this forward to 2.18).

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Looks like locking statement was already outside try-catch block for 2.18.

@wdallastella
Copy link

Just in case, could you test with this branch version? @wdallastella

@JooHyukKim just tested and worked fine.

@JooHyukKim
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the report @wdallastella !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants