Integrate #91: pre-registration must be durable and timestamped before the run - #93
Merged
Conversation
…d before the run Pre-registration's evidentiary value is ordering — that the criteria were frozen before results were seen. A pre-reg written to ephemeral scratch loses that: once the directory is reclaimed, the finding's citation is indistinguishable from an unbacked claim that a pre-reg existed. Transcribing the criteria into the write-up instead does not fix it. That copy is made after results are in, so it cannot evidence ordering, and it fails silently where a dead link at least fails loud.
# Conflicts: # skills/ground-truth-gates/SKILL.md
…nverged) Both lenses flagged the same two: the durable/ephemeral definitions co-applied to a gitignored-but-archived class with no precedence — folded with check-ignore winning (an ignored working path is ephemeral even when an external archive preserves it; cite the archive itself), which matches the citation semantics the clause protects; and the Provenance entry now carries the house contributor-reported/not-linkable label. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WMbbZQ8ZMMsNRGyV2nvJR8
This was referenced Jul 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Integration of contributor PR #91 onto post-#90 main (one Provenance
stacking conflict resolved), plus one gate-fold commit.
What lands: ground-truth-gates' experiment-grader paragraph gains the
pre-registration ordering clause — write the pre-reg somewhere durable and
timestamped BEFORE the first run, cite that timestamp in the finding; an
operable durable/ephemeral boundary; post-hoc transcription named as
ordering-evidence-free and silent-failing; re-check cited paths resolve
before publishing. Ships
unprobed(in-body marker + Provenance; trackedin #92).
Review gate: 2 rounds. r1 (grok-4.5 high + gpt-5.6-luna ultra):
both lenses converged on the same two findings, folded — a precedence
sentence for the durable/ephemeral overlap (check-ignore wins: an ignored
working path is ephemeral even when an external archive preserves it —
cite the archive itself), and the house contributor-reported/not-linkable
Provenance label. r2 pre-commit (grok + luna + sol-max): TRIPLE PROCEED,
zero findings; sol explicitly confirmed the fold does not permit post-run
archiving as ordering evidence.
python3 .github/checks.pygreen; added lines ≤80 chars.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01WMbbZQ8ZMMsNRGyV2nvJR8