Skip to content

Combined-gate rounds 4-8 folds: cap lifted, terminal double-PROCEED reached - #60

Merged
F-e-u-e-r merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
combined-gate-postmerge-folds
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

Combined-gate rounds 4-8 folds: cap lifted, terminal double-PROCEED reached#60
F-e-u-e-r merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
combined-gate-postmerge-folds

Conversation

@F-e-u-e-r

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Continuation of PR #59's combined cross-model gate, with the round cap lifted by the owner. Rounds 4–8 ran against the merged eleven-rule set on main; this branch carries their folds (+58/−21 across 4 files).

Rounds and dispositions

Same reviewer pair as #59, re-verified each round: grok-4.5 / high (grok 0.2.101) and gpt-5.6-luna / ultra (codex-cli 0.144.6, banner-confirmed). Packets carried the combined diff, all six post-merge files, and the cumulative disposition ledger of every prior round.

  • r4 (6988ed2): grok FIX 1 (+2 nits) / codex FIX 1–8. Fixed 8 (channel presence established-never-assumed with fail-closed unknown; §3 dedup clause quoted verbatim; "as if the property were absent"; battery responses route-attributed; batch dup-search clause; cited-run revision must contain the change; serialized ledger write-backs). Rejected 2 with counter-evidence: codex F5 (the settled-tree reference already scopes post-apply drift to "drifted paths plus their dependents are UNREVIEWED"), codex F8 (packet-limitation standing rejection — the reviewers' own surface-1 sweeps are that search).
  • r5 (f07af13): grok FIX 1 (+2 nits) / codex FIX 1,2 — grok F1 and codex F1 were the same finding, independently (the r4 batch clause was same-file-scoped). Fixed 4, rejected 0. Also: verbatim finders quote re-wrapped character-identical; port defense (1) covers independent session trees; hosted-behavior carve-out covers non-routing acting sessions.
  • r6 (704a5d5): grok FIX 1 (+1 nit) / codex PROCEED (first all-clear). Fixed 2: the carve-out no longer paraphrases pinned-string into a subset (re-probe satisfied only under its attribution/unknown-fallback clauses, pinned-string named winner); ledger's §3 dedup quote completed.
  • r7 (9b1529e): grok PROCEED (+1 non-blocking nit, folded per the inventory's own update imperative — the §5 owed-lines list gains this merge's two record lines) / codex FIX 1 (fixed: UNRESOLVED-confirmed transition added to the ledger write-back, incl. same-round confirm-and-fix).
  • r8: grok PROCEED + codex PROCEED — zero findings from both; terminal condition met. (grok's first r8 attempt died in a max_tokens_truncation with no verdict — recorded, retried once per the partial-failure rule; the retry produced the full-body PROCEED. Its failure dump reported the serving name grok-4.5-build for the requested grok-4.5 — a wrapper-internal route name, noted as an identity observation, invocation unchanged.)

Every finding across r4–r8 carries a disposition: 15 fixed (several scoped to their valid core), 2 rejected with recorded counter-evidence, 0 re-raises of closed items accepted. The valid must-fixes of r4–r7 were overwhelmingly residue of earlier fold wording — the eleven rules' substance produced no new confirmed defect after round 1 of #59.

Checks: python3 .github/checks.py green on every fold; zero-width/bidi sweep clean on all added lines.


🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01GhLu6NCGzM9HxnqNb87MAx

F-e-u-e-r and others added 4 commits July 23, 2026 07:27
… rejected

grok r4 F1 (+n2): channel presence is now established, never assumed —
wrapper docs/config declaring a what-answered report or a prior
same-wrapper emission establishes the channel; no-channel-by-design
needs the same evidence positively showing none; UNKNOWN presence
fails closed (block, not downgrade); discriminating pos/neg pair added.
grok r4 n3 + codex r4 F3: the sweep field now quotes S3's dedup clause
verbatim ('everything ever surfaced, including ones already rejected')
instead of the paraphrase that dropped both load-bearing halves.
codex r4 F1 (scoped): 'route as if unguarded' -> 'route as if the
property were absent (no edge guard, no latency class, no failure
signature)' — the conservative direction now explicit per property.
codex r4 F2: the pinned-string re-probe requires battery responses
route-attributed (not just a preceding trivial check); pos example
says 'named the slug as what answered each response'.
codex r4 F4: the S5 reviewer procedure gains the batch clause — a
batch landing multiple additions to one file also searches the merged
result across added hunks (two additions can collide with neither in
the base).
codex r4 F6: the check-name trace requires the cited run's revision to
contain the change under review (a green base-revision run is evidence
about that revision, never the change).
codex r4 F7 (scoped): campaign write-backs serialize; concurrent
writers over one ledger follow S4's edit-conflict rule — no
last-writer-wins.

Rejected with counter-evidence (trail): codex r4 F5 (multi-verdict
application — the reference already scopes post-apply drift to
'drifted paths plus their dependents are UNREVIEWED: fresh-context
re-review covers them'; a later verdict is not voided, its coverage
shrinks to what it actually reviewed); codex r4 F8 (in-packet absence
of the search record = packet-limitation, the standing rejection —
the gate-runner and both reviewers' surface-1 sweeps ARE that search,
three rounds clean).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GhLu6NCGzM9HxnqNb87MAx
…cted

grok r5 F1 + codex r5 F1 (same finding, independently): the r4 batch
dup-search clause was same-file-scoped and actively taught that
cross-file batches skip the merged search — now covers additions
across files in the search set (targets, siblings, routers/entry
files), searching the merged result across all added hunks.
grok r5 n2: the sweep field's finders quote re-wrapped so the joined
text is character-identical to S3's canonical line (by-container no
longer split across a hard-wrap under a 'verbatim' claim).
grok r5 n3: port defense (1) covers 'per worktree or independent
session tree' — the rule's trigger spans sibling sessions beyond
linked worktrees.
codex r5 F2: the hosted-behavior carve-out no longer leaves a class
uncovered between the two rules — date-stamp where written, and ANY
session acting on the negative (routing decision or not) re-probes at
decision time before repeating or relying on it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GhLu6NCGzM9HxnqNb87MAx
grok r6 F1: the r5 hosted-behavior carve-out had paraphrased
pinned-string's duties into an incomplete subset (the pack's own
no-paraphrase rule) — the re-probe is now explicitly satisfied only
under the pinned-string rule's attribution and
unknown-property-fallback clauses (an unattributed answer never
satisfies it), with the pinned-string rule named winner on any
wording disagreement.
grok r6 n2: the ledger reference's S3 dedup quote completed to the
full canonical sentence ('dedup against confirmed-only never
converges').

codex r6: zero findings, PROCEED — all seven surfaces reported clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GhLu6NCGzM9HxnqNb87MAx
grok r7: PROCEED, zero must-fix. Its non-blocking nit folded per the
inventory's own update imperative — the S5 owed-lines list gains the
two record lines this merge ships (skill-authoring S5 dup-check result
line; S6 target-runtime line of a skill review record).
codex r7 F1: the ledger write-back gains the missing confirmation
transition — an UNRESOLVED item confirmed this round moves to OPEN
FINDINGS, and confirmed-and-fixed in the same round goes straight to
PRIOR FIXES with the fix's evidence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GhLu6NCGzM9HxnqNb87MAx
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant