Skip to content

Conversation

fdupress
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@fdupress
Copy link
Member Author

This is likely to stay WIP for a chunk. Useful bits could be pulled out as and when for merging.

@strub
Copy link
Member

strub commented Aug 28, 2025

@fdupress Why not merging what is already there?

@fdupress
Copy link
Member Author

Because it doesn't have the one thing I want: folding a function that is associative only over non-repeating lists.

We could merge this, but I don't think it brings much value yet.

@fdupress
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry, that's an answer to "What are you waiting for?"

Why I don't merge what I have now is that I don't know if they are the right lemmas to have on this yet, and the project that would allow me to give it its trial by fire has been on hold for a bit.

@strub
Copy link
Member

strub commented Aug 29, 2025

Let put this for the next meeting. bigop+perm_eq+uniq already provides this. Adding a thin layer on top of that could be sufficient.

@fdupress
Copy link
Member Author

fdupress commented Sep 7, 2025

Conclusion to the meeting was: we need both your commit and what I want.

I was also due to undo the force push, but haven't gotten around to it yet. (Sorry!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants