Skip to content

Annotation of missing quality indicators for task pages#619

Merged
dgarijo merged 4 commits intoEVERSE-ResearchSoftware:mainfrom
andriumon:main
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

Annotation of missing quality indicators for task pages#619
dgarijo merged 4 commits intoEVERSE-ResearchSoftware:mainfrom
andriumon:main

Conversation

@andriumon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before creating a pull request:

Fixes #562

Changes proposed in this pull request:

Added annotations for missing indicators for the following pages

  • pages/tasks/archiving_software.md
  • pages/tasks/code_review.md
  • pages/tasks/organising_software_projects.md
  • pages/tasks/publishing_software.md
  • pages/tasks/releasing_software.md
  • pages/tasks/testing_software.md

Notes for reviewers:

Review pending by @dgarijo

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Deploy Preview for everse-rsqkit-testing ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e77bb8a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/everse-rsqkit-testing/deploys/69dcc3eb6dc4750008c84e7e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-619--everse-rsqkit-testing.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please not change this file? Or is it automatically changed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is automatically changed. When I did the PR this commit wasn't included

related_pages:
tasks: []
quality_indicators: [human_code_review_requirement]
quality_indicators: [human_code_review_requirement, uses_tool_for_warnings_and_mistakes, lines_of_code_ok, internal_cohesion_ok, coupling_between_objects_ok, has_no_linting_issues, cyclomatic_complexity_ok]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dgarijo dgarijo Apr 13, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
quality_indicators: [human_code_review_requirement, uses_tool_for_warnings_and_mistakes, lines_of_code_ok, internal_cohesion_ok, coupling_between_objects_ok, has_no_linting_issues, cyclomatic_complexity_ok]
quality_indicators: [human_code_review_requirement, uses_tool_for_warnings_and_mistakes, has_no_linting_issues]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dgarijo dgarijo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small updates request. Other than that, looking good

@dgarijo dgarijo merged commit 56a2d37 into EVERSE-ResearchSoftware:main Apr 13, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Annotate missing indicator in task pages

2 participants