Skip to content

Add ci documentation upstream#420

Closed
srghosh56 wants to merge 22 commits intoEVERSE-ResearchSoftware:mainfrom
srghosh56:add-ci-documentation-upstream
Closed

Add ci documentation upstream#420
srghosh56 wants to merge 22 commits intoEVERSE-ResearchSoftware:mainfrom
srghosh56:add-ci-documentation-upstream

Conversation

@srghosh56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #418 and #419

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Add comprehensive guide for using local GitLab CI infrastructure with GitHub projects
  • Add guide for managing complex CI testing matrices for research software
  • Both guides address advanced CI/CD challenges in research software development
  • Include real-world examples from HPC research environments (Alpaka, PIConGPU)
  • Provide optimization strategies reducing CI job combinations from thousands to dozens

Notes for reviewers:

  • The contents have been reviewed by the main author of this presentation
  • Waiting for final inputs from @juckel
  • Content is based on real implementations from Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
  • Both documents follow RSQKit template structure and metadata guidelines

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Deploy Preview for everse-rsqkit-testing ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a2fe5c2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/everse-rsqkit-testing/deploys/686fd200c4a5a000084f53e7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-420--everse-rsqkit-testing.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@srghosh56 srghosh56 force-pushed the add-ci-documentation-upstream branch from a063f1e to a2fe5c2 Compare July 10, 2025 14:45
@srghosh56 srghosh56 closed this Jul 10, 2025
@srghosh56 srghosh56 deleted the add-ci-documentation-upstream branch July 10, 2025 14:49
@dgarijo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dgarijo commented Jul 10, 2025 via email

@srghosh56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No, I was by no means trying to push any training material in RSQkit, it came from git branch history contamination. That's why I closed these PRs. I created a new clean PR with only the intended "your_tasks" files that I intend to push to RSQkit.

@dgarijo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dgarijo commented Jul 10, 2025 via email

@srghosh56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

srghosh56 commented Jul 10, 2025

Can't mark anyone as reviewers, I don't have access. This is the clean PR #423

@dgarijo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dgarijo commented Jul 11, 2025

thx, I will add myself and will review as soon as time allows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using local GitLab CI infrastructure for your GitHub project

2 participants