Skip to content

Added code to make st-archive handle DART files #3084

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kdraeder
Copy link

Description of changes

Make st_archive handle compressed (.gz) CLM output files.

Specific notes

This is very helpful for (large multi-instance, multiple short hindcast) data assimilation experiments.
config_archive.xml already handles DART's .e. files.

Contributors other than yourself, if any: none

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #): #3082

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? I don't believe so at this time.
Later it may be useful to add documentation about how DART files are archived, to help users find them.

Testing performed, if any:
I ran a B compset built from the tags in .gitmodules, but no development branches checked out.
I ran st_archive on the output to confirm that it handled all files correctly.
I checked out a feature branch based on master, added the code changes, and pushed to the fork
on kdraeder.
See CIME PR #4788 for details.

@ekluzek ekluzek added the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Apr 24, 2025
@wwieder wwieder removed the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Apr 24, 2025
@wwieder wwieder requested a review from ekluzek April 24, 2025 16:14
@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Apr 24, 2025

Erik will bring this to b4b-dev

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Ready to start (or start again) in CTSM: Upcoming tags Apr 24, 2025
@wwieder wwieder moved this from Ready to start (or start again) to In progress - b4b-dev in CTSM: Upcoming tags Apr 24, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek self-assigned this Apr 29, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the ctsm6.0.0 (code freeze) milestone Apr 29, 2025
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Apr 29, 2025

We should rebase this to b4b-dev and bring it in there.

@ekluzek ekluzek added enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability bfb bit-for-bit labels Apr 29, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from Todo to In Progress in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board May 9, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from In Progress to Todo in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board May 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bfb bit-for-bit enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
Projects
Status: In progress - b4b-dev
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants