fix: enforce respectful disagreement in scholarly discourse - #361
Conversation
|
@nickymicky908 Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Strict review blocker: and are failing. Please fix both before requesting merge. |
|
Strict review blocker: |
|
Strict review blocker: required checks are failing. Please fix the failures before requesting merge. |
Overview
This PR adds an AI-style Respectful Disagreement Enforcement system that keeps scholarly discourse aligned with adab al-ikhtilaf. It detects disrespectful language, dismissive characterizations, absolutist claims on debated matters, and polarizing rhetoric; validates acknowledgment of legitimate differences; suggests respectful alternative phrasings; blocks highly disrespectful content from delivery; and supports continuous pattern learning.
Related Issue
Closes #
Changes
🛡️ Respectful Disagreement Enforcement Engine
[MODIFY]
misinformation.py[MODIFY]
safety/output_check.py[MODIFY]
safety/policy.yaml[MODIFY]
config.pyVerification Results
Closes #180