Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update custom-javascript-assertion.md #26973

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

surajtikoo
Copy link
Contributor

I encountered an issue with a JavaScript assertion where the logs were not printing as expected. After extensive debugging, I discovered that only 4 logs can be printed at a time. This realization came after a significant amount of time spent troubleshooting. Including this limitation as a note would be highly beneficial.

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

Merge queue is enabled in this repo. To have it automatically merged after it receives the required reviews, create the PR (from a branch that follows the <yourname>/description naming convention) and then add the following PR comment:

/merge

Additional notes

I encountered an issue with a JavaScript assertion where the logs were not printing as expected. After extensive debugging, I discovered that only 4 logs can be printed at a time. This realization came after a significant amount of time spent troubleshooting. Including this limitation as a note would be highly beneficial.
@surajtikoo surajtikoo requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2025 17:03
@brett0000FF brett0000FF added the under_review Sent to someone outside of the docs team for review. label Jan 6, 2025
@brett0000FF
Copy link
Contributor

@surajtikoo - Thank you for the contribution and suggestion! We are going to validate this change with Engineering.

@surajtikoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

surajtikoo commented Jan 8, 2025 via email

@aliciascott
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @surajtikoo I am looking into this for you with our engineering team, thank you!

@aliciascott
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @surajtikoo I am looking into this for you with our engineering team, thank you!

Our engineering team ran some tests with this and indeed this is a limitation to prevent the test result from getting too big. This is a great addition to the docs, thank you!

@aliciascott aliciascott removed the under_review Sent to someone outside of the docs team for review. label Jan 22, 2025
@aliciascott aliciascott merged commit 9841160 into DataDog:master Jan 22, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
p-datadog pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
* merge: (30 commits)
  Revert "Update minimum Ruby tracer version for dynamic instrumentation to 2.9.0 (#27233)"
  Update custom-javascript-assertion.md (#26973)
  [DOCS-9908] Update RUM react initialization parameter (#27231)
  Update minimum Ruby tracer version for dynamic instrumentation to 2.9.0 (#27233)
  (DOCS-9604) Update images and text to match new panel style (#27173)
  Bump otel-agent version to 7.61  (#27221)
  Add note about key validation delay to API and Application keys docum… (#27210)
  Add support for vulnerability management - GetSBOM new endpoint (#27128)
  [ACCESS-3116] Show display name of permissions on permissions page (#27218)
  [DOCS-9912] Remove SDS via agent (#27215)
  [SDCI-880] Add K8s explanation for infra correlation for Gitlab (#27061)
  [AWSX] Update AWS integration role documentation (#27205)
  Include Weaver as a supported framework in Test Optimization for Java (#27152)
  (DOCS-9872) Add docs for Form component (#27118)
  OTel Troubleshooting Update (#27010)
  DOCS-9641 Take 2 (#27213)
  init (#27212)
  Updates the language on the serverless init cloud run page to push customers to use the sidecar (#27101)
  add additional note to the getlog limitation (#27209)
  fix ref numbers (#27206)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants